Judge Rules Against Universal, Prince in Copyright Battle Over YouTube Video

Judge Rules Against Universal, Prince in Copyright Battle Over YouTube Video

Aug 21, 2008
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

A judge warns copyright owners must consider “fair use” before sending Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices.

California Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled Aug. 21, that a California mother’s use of the Prince song “Let’s Go Crazy #1” in the 29-second YouTube video of her child dancing on the kitchen table was acceptable. Universal Music, which owns the rights to the Prince song, should have considered whether Stephanie Lenz violated to “fair use” doctrine before it demanded YouTube remove the video.

Good faith reviews will help ensure that the “efficiency of the Internet will continue to improve and that the variety and quality of services on the Internet will expand,” the judge concluded.

Universal argued that copyright owners should not have to consider fair use before issuing a takedown notice because fair use is simply an excused form of infringement instead of an authorized one. Even if a content owner did have to evaluate fair use, they should only have to do so after the takedown notice is issued.

Click here to read the full story on PCMag.com.

A Judge warns copyright owners must consider “fair use” before sending Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices.

California Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled Aug. 21, that a California mother’s use of the Prince song “Let’s Go Crazy #1” in the 29-second YouTube video of her child dancing on the kitchen table was acceptable. Universal Music, which owns the rights to the Prince song, should have considered whether Stephanie Lenz violated to “fair use” doctrine before it demanded YouTube remove the video.

Good faith reviews will help ensure that the “efficiency of the Internet will continue to improve and that the variety and quality of services on the Internet will expand,” the judge concluded.

Universal argued that copyright owners should not have to consider fair use before issuing a takedown notice because fair use is simply an excused form of infringement instead of an authorized one. Even if a content owner did have to evaluate fair use, they should only have to do so after the takedown notice is issued.

Click here to read the full story on PCMag.com.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.