eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.
As the new Congress reconvened the week of Sept. 3, there was guarded optimism in Washington technology policy shops that the 8-month-old Democratic-led body will continue to champion a pro-tech agenda. For the first time in six years, the tech wish list actually finds itself on offense instead of defense.
Fresh from authorizing a 10-year investment of $33.6 billion in critical competitiveness areas, with patent reform on the fast track and little opposition to extending an expiring ban on Internet connection taxes, law_makers seem to be thinking of technology this year as a priority—rather than an afterthought—on a crowded federal agenda.
The lingering question, though, is whether its just feel-good legislation or a more serious commitment by Democrats—aided by a healthy dose of Republicans—to change the direction of national technology policy.
Looming over it all is next years presidential election, narrowing even more the window of opportunity for constructive legislative gains before the political campaign saps the momentum of the 110th Congress.
For example, authorizing investments is easy, an abstract nod to the deep pockets of Silicon Valley. Appropriating those funds for next year and the next nine years is a much trickier enterprise. That bruising battle is still to come when the budget committees begin to hammer out just how much of the authorizations in the America Competes Act will actually be spent.
“If they dont follow up with the money, its just talk,” said Tom Galvin, a partner at Washingtons 463 Communications, which counts among its clients Sun Microsystems, Cisco Systems and TechNet, the politically savvy CEO network. “Theres going to be a push for Congress to put its money where its mouth is.”
Patent reform faces a similarly shaky future. Although the judiciary committees of both the House and Senate have approved bills strongly favored by the tech industry, there are still questions about how the legislation will play with the broader membership, particularly those with strong ties and constituencies in the pharmaceutical and manufacturing industries.
Even in those channels, there is an admission that the system needs reforming. But, they argue, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., the shepherds of the Democrats patent reform push, are going too far.
Click here to read more about patent reform.
“We are very concerned that the bill in its present form picks winners and losers among industries with different business models in a way that has never before been attempted in patent law or practice,” House Republican Leader John Boehner and his whip, Rep. Roy Blunt, wrote in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Aug. 30.
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 seeks the first significant changes in U.S. patent law in several decades. The bills provisions include narrowing the definition of willful infringement, which brings treble damages, and limiting infringement damages to the actual value of the technology involved. Currently, juries calculate damages based on the overall value of the finished product.
The bill also seeks to limit bad and questionable patents at the source, creating a “second window” to challenge or squash patents newly issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Further, the legislation would create a first-inventor-to-file system to replace the current first-to-invent standard, moving the United States closer to international patent standards.
“Rather than scheduling this bill for quick consideration by the House, we are asking you to work with the sponsors in urging them to continue to find consensus so that all U.S. companies benefit from reforming the patent system rather than advancing one business model over another,” Boehner and Blunt wrote in their letter to Pelosi. “If that course is pursued, we stand ready to work with you in a bipartisan manner.”
Pelosi promptly scheduled a floor vote on the bill for Sept. 7. The bill passed by a vote of 220 in favor of it and 175 opposed.
“The common view is not what will happen in the House, but what will happen in the Senate,” said Roger Cochetti, group director of U.S. public policy at the Computing Technology Industry Association, one of the numerous Washington-based trade groups representing IT interests. “The showdown will be in the Senate.”
Cochetti said there is a lot of momentum for patent reform in Congress, though 463s Galvin was more circumspect. “There are still a lot of divisions within various industries,” Galvin said. “I dont see it happening without a major breakthrough compromise. Otherwise, theyre just playing kick the can.”
If the House approves a tech-driven patent reform bill and the Senate takes a pass, it wouldnt be the first time the upper chamber ignored the Houses tech policy ideas. Four years ago, the House voted to make a temporary ban on Internet connection taxes permanent and to strip away a grand_father clause that exempted nine states from the ban. The Senate dismissed the notion, agreeing only to extend the ban—grandfather clause intact—for another three years.
Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, views and analysis on servers, switches and networking protocols for the enterprise and small businesses.