Close
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News

      Microsoft Asks Judge to Dismiss Suit

      By
      Darryl K. Taft
      -
      May 16, 2002
      Share
      Facebook
      Twitter
      Linkedin

        WASHINGTON D.C.—Microsoft Corp. on Thursday argued that the states proposals to auction, put out for open source and remove code from the companys intellectual property amount to divestiture, which is not supported by the evidence in their case.

        Microsoft attorney Dan Webb argued that the states must show a clear link between Microsofts anticompetitive conduct and its dominant position in the market to be granted any structural relief.

        “The structural remedy here in this case is enormous,” Webb told U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. “It is so much worse than the structural relief applied by [U.S. District] Judge [Thomas Penfield Jackson].”

        Jackson had ruled that Microsoft should be broken into two following the liability phase of this case. That ruling was overturned on appeal.

        “If you take those three things [the plaintiffs want], thats the crown jewels of the company,” Webb argued. “If you take away Windows, Office and Internet Explorer, youve taken away the entire company.”

        The nine states and District of Columbia are seeking harsher penalties on the Redmond, Wash., company than what was agreed upon last year by the U.S. Department of Justice.

        The states have proposed auctioning Office to other companies to port it to competing operating systems, making IE an open source technology and making Microsoft provide a modular, or stripped-down, version of Windows.

        “Microsoft would still have the technology,” said Steven Kuney, an attorney for the states. “I suppose you could call it divestiture of some intellectual property, but not like that Microsoft faced in front of the Court of Appeals.”

        Webbs comments came as part of Microsofts request that Kollar-Kotelly dismiss the states claims. He argued that the states are only entitled to relief based the 12 acts the appellate court found Microsoft guilty of violating following the antitrust trial.

        “The Court of Appeals is saying any remedy you enter should be based on the 12 acts,” Webb said. “They have to prove a greater showing of causation than the liability trial, which the Court of Appeals has already said was inefficient.”

        However, Webb conceded that the states are due relief on the 12 acts in question.

        Kollar-Kotelly asked Webb if any of the states proposals might be fit to serve as injunctions on the 12 acts. He replied that he could not think of any.

        The judge is holding hearings this week to allow both sides to argue their points, which she said will help her craft a decision.

        Webb said Microsoft has worked hard to comply with the courts findings and has stopped all the 12 “bad acts.” He said only the issue of commingling of code exists today, and Microsoft addresses that by removing end-user access in its proposed agreement with the Department of Justice and the settling states.

        Kuney told the judge Microsoft is continuing its anticompetitive behavior.

        “We believe that behavior found wrong by the Court of Appeals is continuing, and commingling is the star of that,” he said.

        Microsoft also argued that the states lack the legal standing to obtain the relief they seek under federal law. They argued only the DOJ could enforce antitrust law and that the Constitution prohibits the non-settling states from using state antitrust law to impose nationwide regulation of Microsofts business activity.

        However, the judge told John Warden, a Microsoft attorney, that the federal government took the position that the states had the right to seek relief, and asked him to explain the divergent views.

        Warden said the DOJ took Microsofts position on policy issues to speak with one voice. The DOJ has “come up to the trough but not drunk” from the body of law the Supreme Court has laid out relating to matters such as this.

        Warden said the DOJ and Microsoft are in accord. “They get to the same conclusions by a more circuitous route.”

        Many of the days spent in this remedy hearing dealt with highly technical issues, but Thursday was a day for lawyers. Both sides cited case after case and legal doctrine after doctrine to support their claims.

        In particular, Microsoft argued the states need to show some specific injury to them to get relief and should not be able to seek relief on a national scale, which is the job of the DOJ.

        Kollar-Kotelly asked John Kester, an attorney for the states, if he felt the states should give any deference to the DOJ in terms of a remedy because the DOJ has settled with Microsoft.

        “Absolutely not,” Kester said. “Its not correct that the United States is entitled to some sort of superior deference.”

        “What limitations, if any, are on the states if the remedy is national in scope?” Kollar-Kotelly asked.

        “The limitation is the good judgment of the court,” Kester said. “The court has considerable discretion and ought to exercise that in developing a remedy. The violator cant say, Im in Redmond, Washington, and you cant touch me.”

        Gene Schaerr, antitrust counsel for the Association for Competitive Technology, said the weakest part of the states argument is that “they represent such a small fraction of the states and yet theyre seeking such broad claims.”

        Darryl K. Taft
        Darryl K. Taft covers the development tools and developer-related issues beat from his office in Baltimore. He has more than 10 years of experience in the business and is always looking for the next scoop. Taft is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and was named 'one of the most active middleware reporters in the world' by The Middleware Co. He also has his own card in the 'Who's Who in Enterprise Java' deck.
        Get the Free Newsletter!
        Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis
        This email address is invalid.
        Get the Free Newsletter!
        Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis
        This email address is invalid.

        MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

        Latest News

        Zeus Kerravala on Networking: Multicloud, 5G, and...

        James Maguire - December 16, 2022 0
        I spoke with Zeus Kerravala, industry analyst at ZK Research, about the rapid changes in enterprise networking, as tech advances and digital transformation prompt...
        Read more
        Applications

        Datadog President Amit Agarwal on Trends in...

        James Maguire - November 11, 2022 0
        I spoke with Amit Agarwal, President of Datadog, about infrastructure observability, from current trends to key challenges to the future of this rapidly growing...
        Read more
        IT Management

        Intuit’s Nhung Ho on AI for the...

        James Maguire - May 13, 2022 0
        I spoke with Nhung Ho, Vice President of AI at Intuit, about adoption of AI in the small and medium-sized business market, and how...
        Read more
        Applications

        Kyndryl’s Nicolas Sekkaki on Handling AI and...

        James Maguire - November 9, 2022 0
        I spoke with Nicolas Sekkaki, Group Practice Leader for Applications, Data and AI at Kyndryl, about how companies can boost both their AI and...
        Read more
        Cloud

        IGEL CEO Jed Ayres on Edge and...

        James Maguire - June 14, 2022 0
        I spoke with Jed Ayres, CEO of IGEL, about the endpoint sector, and an open source OS for the cloud; we also spoke about...
        Read more
        Logo

        eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

        Facebook
        Linkedin
        RSS
        Twitter
        Youtube

        Advertisers

        Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

        Advertise with Us

        Menu

        • About eWeek
        • Subscribe to our Newsletter
        • Latest News

        Our Brands

        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms
        • About
        • Contact
        • Advertise
        • Sitemap
        • California – Do Not Sell My Information

        Property of TechnologyAdvice.
        © 2022 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

        Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

        ×