Microsoft Scores Court Victory Against Waledac Botnet

Microsoft Scores Court Victory Against Waledac Botnet

Written By
Brian Prince
Brian Prince
Sep 9, 2010
3 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

A federal judge has brought Microsoft one step closer to seizing control of 276 domains controlled by the Waledac botnet.

A magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court of Eastern Virginia decided Sept. 3 to recommend that a default judgment be granted in Microsoft’s favor. The defendants in the case were given 14 days to object; if they do not, the judgment will be final.

“In this case, Microsoft presented evidence to the court that although the defendants did not come forward, they were aware of the case and actively tried to retaliate, attempting to launch a distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack against the law firm that filed the suit and even going so far as to threaten one of the researchers involved in the case,” according to Microsoft.

The legal action was the result of a joint investigation known as -Operation b49′ that also involved Symantec, Shadowserver Foundation, the University of Washington and others. Once capable of sending out more than 1.5 billion spam messages a day, the number of unique infected IP addresses has continued to decline, going from 64,000 during the week of July 23 to 58,000 as of Aug. 30.

“As we wrote in March, communications within the botnet remain dead and we haven’t seen any new infections since we first took action,” Microsoft said. “This is a direct result both of the ex parte temporary restraining order granted by the court in February which allowed us to take the domains controlling Waledac offline before the bot-herders could move operations, as well as the remarkable mobilization by the global security community to disrupt the peer-to-peer communication within Waledac. Through this process, the courts and the security community have paved the way for future takedowns in cases where criminals are abusing anonymity to victimize computer users around the world.”

Members of the security community have worked individually and collectively to takedown botnets on multiple occasions in the past with mixed results. Just recently for example, researchers at LastLine reached out to hosting providers for the Pushdo botnet, but were greeted by some with inaction. The result was only about 20 of the botnet’s 30 servers were taken offline, and while spam from the botnet dropped initially, it began to tick up back up shortly thereafter.

“The Waledac takedown is the first undertaking in a larger Microsoft-led initiative called Project MARS (Microsoft Active Response for Security), which is a joint effort between Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit, the Microsoft Malware Protection Center (MMPC), Microsoft Support and the Trustworthy Computing team to annihilate botnets and help make the Internet safer for everyone…We’re also seeing other members of the security industry and law enforcement taking proactive action to both study and dismantle other botnets, such as the recent actions against Mariposa and Pushdo/Cutwail,” Microsoft said. “While the approaches to these actions have differed somewhat from the Waledac takedown, all of these efforts demonstrate that the industry is beginning to take a more aggressive stance against botnets.”

UPDATE: This story was updated to add the exact date the judge decided to make the recommendation.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.