Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News
    • Mobile
    • Networking

    FCC Should Reassess Its Advice on Cell Phone Radio-Frequency Limits: GAO

    By
    Michelle Maisto
    -
    August 8, 2012
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      Questions about whether smartphones and the radio-frequency energy they emit can cause health problems in users were the impetus for an investigation by the Government Accountability Office. What it found was that the Federal Communications Commission’s current RF guidance doesn’t reflect the latest research and that testing requirements may not identify the possible maximum exposure in some use cases.

      GAO now recommends that the FCC “formally reassess and, if appropriate, change its current RF energy exposure limit and mobile phone testing requirements related to likely usage configurations, particularly when phones are held against the body,” it wrote in a summary of its July report.

      The relationship between the FCC and GAO is apparently as polite as that quote implies, and explains why the FCC is still using guidelines based on 1996 data, while the European Union and other countries have since updated their recommendations to reflect more recent findings. GAO explains in its summary that the no government agency advised the FCC to update its recommendations, and so it didn’t, and because the FCC didn’t ask to be advised on the matter, it wasn’t.

      GAO also notes that while federal agencies and the mobile phone industry provide information about the health effects of mobile phone use in device manuals and on their respective Websites, “there are no federal requirements that manufacturers provide information to consumers about the health effects of mobile phone use.”

      The issue of device RF levels has been a contentious one between politicians and the mobile industry, which has framed it as a nonissue that could make consumers unnecessarily fearful.

      Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) was the most recent politician to propose legislation on the issue. On Aug. 6, he introduced a Cell Phone Right to Know Act that requests that a national research program be established to study cell phones’ potential effects on users’ health, that data be updated about Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)€”the amount of RF energy that the body absorbs while using a cell phone€”and cell phones carry warning labels that show the device’s SAR.

      The World Health Organization, in May, put RF electromagnetic fields in a category with lead and mercury, calling them “possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.”

      “A labeling law will ensure that cell phone users can decide for themselves the level of risk that they will accept,” Kucinich said in a June 30 statement preceding the bill. “Obviously, cell phone companies should not be the ones making that decision for us.”

      In 2010, the city of San Francisco voted in a favor of a bill requiring retailers to display SAR information beside phones in at least 11-point type. The bill was put on hold, however, after the city was sued by the CTIA, a group that represents the wireless industry.

      In response to the GAO report, John Walls, vice president of public affairs for CTIA, said in an Aug. 7 statement that while the group has not yet had a chance to fully review the report, it appreciates the GAO’s review of the scientific research in the area.

      Walls added, in part, “CTIA continues to defer to the views of scientific experts, federal agencies with expertise and impartial health organizations.”

      While CTIA and others are nervous about the impact that SAR listings and bills like Kucinich’s could have on device sales, the industry has always also known how to make a buck.

      At least one app in the Google Play market now takes on the issue. Called Tawkon, it “alerts you when your phone levels spike, and offers tips to help you lower it. Tawkon empowers you to live a healthier lifestyle,” says its description in the app store.

      A screen shot of the app in action shows it alerting a user: “Radiation exposure warning! Use speaker/handset.”

      It’s advice even the GAO is likely to get behind.

      “Some consumers may use mobile phones against the body,” says the GAO report, “which FCC does not currently test, and could result in RF energy exposure higher than the FCC limit.”

      Avatar
      Michelle Maisto
      Michelle Maisto has been covering the enterprise mobility space for a decade, beginning with Knowledge Management, Field Force Automation and eCRM, and most recently as the editor-in-chief of Mobile Enterprise magazine. She earned an MFA in nonfiction writing from Columbia University, and in her spare time obsesses about food. Her first book, The Gastronomy of Marriage, if forthcoming from Random House in September 2009.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×