Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News

      Microsoft Reiterates Call for Lower-Court Review

      By
      Scott Berinato
      -
      August 22, 2000
      Share
      Facebook
      Twitter
      Linkedin

        Legally, its called “Microsofts Reply Brief to the Supreme Court of the United States.” But really its Microsoft Corp.s latest objection to the expediting of its antitrust case directly to the Supreme Court.

        And in this latest in a seemingly never-ending river of briefs, Microsoft not surprisingly states that the Department of Justice is wrong, and that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia should hear the case before the Supreme Court.

        Microsofts Tuesday filing, the last before the Supreme Court decides whether to take the case, argues five points: The Expediting Act gives the Supreme Court the discretion to deny such appeals; using AT&T Corp.s breakup case as a precedent to support expedited review is unfounded; the factual issues in the case are complex enough to warrant appeals court review; procedural errors and other legal nitpickings warrant further review; and the DOJs other arguments are simply “unavailing.”

        Microsofts lawyers, who have often pointed to the far-reaching effects this case has on the national economy, now contend that, unlike other antitrust cases, this one is not a “true national emergency.”

        “The need for soundness in the result outweighs the need for speed in reaching it,” Microsoft lawyers quote Justice Burton, addressing the Steel Seizure antitrust case of the 1950s. “The Nation is entitled to the substantial value inherent in an immediate consideration of the issue by the Court of Appeals.”

        Countering the DOJs last brief, which was heavy with case precedents, Microsoft likewise points to more than a dozen cases to support its stand.

        A footnote offends

        But the overall tone of todays document suggests a case subjected to shoddy lawyering by the plaintiffs.

        “Appellees halfheartedly argue that the record … presents no obstacle to direct review,” Microsoft states at one point, while at another spot, “On the clearest procedural errors below, appellees are conspicuously silent.” And another: “Appellees seek to minimize the complexity of the legal issues raised here by downplaying some and ignoring others. For example, in their statement of the case, appellees relegate the discussion of their tying claim — the linchpin of their complaints — to a footnote.”

        Microsofts lawyers even answer a rhetorical question posed in the DOJs briefing, filed last week. “Appellees ask rhetorically what future case would qualify for direct review if this case does not. The answer is: a case in which the nature of the issues presented and the state of the record make it suitable for direct review by this Court. AT&T was such a case; this case is not.”

        But Microsoft saves its harshest words for last, zeroing in on the so-called amicus briefings filed with last weeks DOJ response. In those documents, Judge Robert Bork, who had previously voiced opposition to expediting the case, comes out favoring it.

        Microsofts lawyers sweepingly dismiss the briefings without counter arguments in a loquacious paragraph:

        “The amicus briefs merit little response,” Microsoft states. “Their scurrilous accusations based entirely on press clippings and other hearsay are emblematic of the sensational manner in which this case was tried. That said, the reversal of position by Judge Bork, counsel of record for one of the amici supporting appellees, warrants mention. Two months ago, Judge Bork was quoted as referring to appellees effort to secure direct review in this Court as a futile gesture, stating I dont quite see the national emergency. … He also was quoted as saying I dont know why this case should be treated like its some kind of an earthquake. … I kind of doubt that the Supreme Court would grant it. … Judge Borks initial reaction was correct, and he offers no explanation for his change of view.”

        Microsoft first urged the Supreme Court on July 26 to send the case back to the D.C. Court of Appeals.

        District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled in June that Microsoft had abused its monopoly power and should be split in two.

        Scott Berinato

        MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

        Cybersecurity

        Visa’s Michael Jabbara on Cybersecurity and Digital...

        James Maguire - May 17, 2022 0
        I spoke with Michael Jabbara, VP and Global Head of Fraud Services at Visa, about the cybersecurity technology used to ensure the safe transfer...
        Read more
        Cloud

        Yotascale CEO Asim Razzaq on Controlling Multicloud...

        James Maguire - May 5, 2022 0
        Asim Razzaq, CEO of Yotascale, provides guidance on understanding—and containing—the complex cost structure of multicloud computing. Among the topics we covered:  As you survey the...
        Read more
        IT Management

        Intuit’s Nhung Ho on AI for the...

        James Maguire - May 13, 2022 0
        I spoke with Nhung Ho, Vice President of AI at Intuit, about adoption of AI in the small and medium-sized business market, and how...
        Read more
        Big Data and Analytics

        GoodData CEO Roman Stanek on Business Intelligence...

        James Maguire - May 4, 2022 0
        I spoke with Roman Stanek, CEO of GoodData, about business intelligence, data as a service, and the frustration that many executives have with data...
        Read more
        Applications

        Cisco’s Thimaya Subaiya on Customer Experience in...

        James Maguire - May 10, 2022 0
        I spoke with Thimaya Subaiya, SVP and GM of Global Customer Experience at Cisco, about the factors that create good customer experience – and...
        Read more
        Logo

        eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

        Facebook
        Linkedin
        RSS
        Twitter
        Youtube

        Advertisers

        Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

        Advertise with Us

        Menu

        • About eWeek
        • Subscribe to our Newsletter
        • Latest News

        Our Brands

        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms
        • About
        • Contact
        • Advertise
        • Sitemap
        • California – Do Not Sell My Information

        Property of TechnologyAdvice.
        © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

        Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

        ×