Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Cloud
    • Cloud
    • Cybersecurity
    • IT Management

    Countries Blast Google for Rolling Out Google Buzz With Poor Privacy Measures

    By
    Clint Boulton
    -
    April 20, 2010
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      Privacy watchdogs from 10 countries wrote a letter to Google CEO Eric Schmidt complaining about Google’s approach to releasing Web applications such as Google Buzz, which touched off a privacy furor when the company launched it in February.

      Data protection leaders in Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain and the United Kingdom said in the April 19 letter that Google Buzz “betrayed a disappointing disregard for fundamental privacy norms and laws.”

      They allege Google launched Buzz in beta form, which they said is no way to ensure that new services comply with privacy principles.

      Yet Buzz was not introduced as a beta project. Google Feb. 9 launched Google Buzz, taking users’ Gmail and chat contacts and using them as the social graph for the service, which lets users post comments, links, photos and videos to ignite conversations.

      But in launching the service, Google made the contacts people followed public on Buzz users’ profile pages, which are public on Google. Users were outraged by how easily Google let everyone see who Buzz users were connected to. Google initially provided too little information about this and did not make information it did provide readily visible in Buzz.

      Google backtracked, said it was trying to make the services as unobtrusive as possible, and instituted several privacy controls, including making followers auto-suggest instead of auto-follow. Yet the damage had been done.

      The Electronic Information Privacy Center filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Congress representatives wrote to the FTC, and Google is facing two class-action lawsuits over Buzz.

      Now the privacy heads of state are piling on:

      “It is unacceptable to roll out a product that unilaterally renders personal information public, with the intention of repairing problems later as they arise,” the parties wrote in the letter. “Privacy cannot be sidelined in the rush to introduce new technologies to online audiences around the world.”

      The letter was sent before Google is expected to launch a new privacy initiative later today. A Google spokesperson alluded to this measure in an e-mail to eWEEK asking for a response the letter.

      “We try very hard to be upfront about the data we collect, and how we use it, as well as to build meaningful controls into our products. Of course we do not get everything 100 percent right–that is why we acted so quickly on Buzz following the user feedback we received. We have discussed all these issues publicly many times before and have nothing to add to today’s letter — instead we are focused on launching our new transparency tool which we are very excited about.”

      The privacy heads note that Google Buzz was not the first time Google trampled on user privacy. They allege Google Street View was launched in some countries without proper consideration of privacy and data protection laws.

      The countries ask that Google “incorporate fundamental privacy principles directly into the design of new online services” going forward.

      Avatar
      Clint Boulton

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×