Close
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications
    • Cybersecurity
    • Development
    • Networking

    MS Patch Day: Can 1 Bulletin Hit the Spot?

    By
    Ryan Naraine
    -
    September 8, 2005
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      Microsoft on Thursday announced plans to ship one security bulletin on Tuesday, Sept. 13, to provide patches for a “critical” flaw in its Windows operating system.

      As part of its advance notice mechanism, the Redmond, Wash.-based software giant said the security update will require a restart and can be detected with the MBSA (Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer) tool.

      The solitary bulletin will give IT administrators a temporary respite from patching—especially after the clean-up from the recent Zotob worm attacks—but to many in the security research community, it underscores Microsoft Corp.s sluggish approach to addressing known security vulnerabilities.

      eEye Digital Security, a private research firm with headquarters in Aliso Viejo, Calif., maintains a Web page of Upcoming Advisories that have been validated by software vendors.

      Next Tuesday, when Microsoft ships the Windows update, one of the eEye-discovered flaws will be 108 days overdue.

      eEye starts counting overdue days a full 60 days after a vulnerability has been “validated” by a software vendor, which means that Microsoft has been aware of the security hole for more than five and a half months.

      /zimages/5/28571.gifRead more here about eEyes discovery of vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer and Outlook.

      In all, eEye has reported nine vulnerabilities that have been validated by officials at the MSRC (Microsoft Security Response Center). Three of the nine flaws are more than two months overdue and all carry a “high severity” risk rating.

      Customers at risk include users of the widely deployed Internet Explorer browser, the Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Express mail clients, and various versions of Windows.

      “Its safe to assume that once we find a flaw, someone else will probably find it. The problem here is that someone malicious might find it and exploit it before Microsoft can provide full protection,” said Steve Manzuik, product manager in eEyes research group.

      “There are some extremely smart hackers out there using and sharing the tools that find these vulnerabilities. When Microsoft takes a long time to issue fixes, it sets up a dangerous situation,” Manzuik said in an interview with Ziff Davis Internet News.

      “This month, Microsoft is only issuing one patch and we already know its not one of ours. That means that our overdue list will keep getting longer and longer,” Manzuik added.

      eEye is not the only private research outfit finding and reporting vulnerabilities to Microsoft. Most companies do not keep a running tally of the flaws they report, and some keep the information under wraps until Microsoft ships the required update.

      “This all goes back to the responsible disclosure debate,” said Thor Larholm, senior security researcher at PivX Solutions Inc., a Newport Beach, Calif.-based security consulting firm.

      /zimages/5/28571.gifRead details here about Microsofts struggles with faulty patches.

      “The longer it takes Microsoft to address a known vulnerability, the higher the probability that one of the bad guys will find it and release the details to the public. Microsoft has a responsibility to get these fixes out quickly,” Larholm said.

      Both Manzuik and Larholm acknowledged that Microsoft has improved significantly in its response to software security, but they argue that the company must find a way to avoid lengthy delays.

      “Microsoft is no longer the worst offender when it comes to sitting on patches. Oracle has taken that crown,” Larholm said. “But I think theres still a culture at Microsoft that security is a PR issue that must be handled delicately. And thats a dangerous culture.”

      “Overall, they have improved, theres no doubt about that. But unless they move faster on some of these high-impact vulnerabilities, well always deal with rogue researchers finding the same things,” Manzuik said.

      /zimages/5/28571.gifRead more here about Microsofts response to the Zotob worm crisis.

      Inevitably, zero-day exploits along with full details of the unpatched flaw are released on underground sites, putting millions of Microsoft customers at risk.

      “It would be really nice to see Microsoft turn around a patch in between 60 and 90 days. Considering the size of the company and the way some of these Internet-facing software [apps] are complicated, the 90-day window isnt that bad. But when it creeps up to three and four months, it becomes unacceptable,” eEyes Manzuik said.

      A spokesperson for the MSRC said Microsoft is still testing the reported vulnerabilities, and that patch quality will take precedence over time.

      “Security response is a delicate balance of time and testing, and Microsoft will only issue an update when it has been fully tested and deemed a complete fix for the issue,” the spokesperson said in an interview.

      “Microsoft has the ability to test on all platforms with a number of different tools and with the developers of each product. Microsoft is able to test more thoroughly than an independent researcher, and has a responsibility to get the update right. They will not compromise the accountability to customers,” she added.

      “The responsibility is always to get it right for the customer.”

      /zimages/5/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest security news, reviews and analysis. And for insights on security coverage around the Web, take a look at eWEEK.com Security Center Editor Larry Seltzers Weblog.

      Ryan Naraine
      Get the Free Newsletter!
      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis
      This email address is invalid.
      Get the Free Newsletter!
      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis
      This email address is invalid.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Latest News

      Zeus Kerravala on Networking: Multicloud, 5G, and...

      James Maguire - December 16, 2022 0
      I spoke with Zeus Kerravala, industry analyst at ZK Research, about the rapid changes in enterprise networking, as tech advances and digital transformation prompt...
      Read more
      Applications

      Datadog President Amit Agarwal on Trends in...

      James Maguire - November 11, 2022 0
      I spoke with Amit Agarwal, President of Datadog, about infrastructure observability, from current trends to key challenges to the future of this rapidly growing...
      Read more
      IT Management

      Intuit’s Nhung Ho on AI for the...

      James Maguire - May 13, 2022 0
      I spoke with Nhung Ho, Vice President of AI at Intuit, about adoption of AI in the small and medium-sized business market, and how...
      Read more
      Applications

      Kyndryl’s Nicolas Sekkaki on Handling AI and...

      James Maguire - November 9, 2022 0
      I spoke with Nicolas Sekkaki, Group Practice Leader for Applications, Data and AI at Kyndryl, about how companies can boost both their AI and...
      Read more
      Cloud

      IGEL CEO Jed Ayres on Edge and...

      James Maguire - June 14, 2022 0
      I spoke with Jed Ayres, CEO of IGEL, about the endpoint sector, and an open source OS for the cloud; we also spoke about...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2022 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×