Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Cybersecurity
    • Cybersecurity

    MyDoom.B Is For Bust

    By
    Larry Seltzer
    -
    February 2, 2004
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      The rapid spread of MyDoom.A was a pretty scary thing to witness. I knew that I had immediately recognized it as a worm when it showed up here, but still its scary when so many people out there get infected. Then MyDoom.B came out and I really got concerned, partly because of its evil practice of locking users out of accessing security sites from which they might disinfect themselves.

      MyDoom.B seemed like a slam-dunk to spread far and fast. Apart from the usual mass-mailing and KaZaA-based propagation methods, it also searches the Internet for systems with the MyDoom.A backdoor installed (and it uses a really weird method of scanning for those systems, skipping many of them for no apparent reason). When it finds a system running the backdoor, it sends it a copy of MyDoom.B for installation.

      In the abstract, this should be the right way to do it, and youd think that with an ecosystem so fertile with MyDoom.A infestations, that B would be all over the place. Such is emphatically not the case. I searched the analyses of the MyDoom.B virus on the Web sites of several security firms. I found little reason for fear; the technical descriptions are all pretty scary, but almost all of those sites with an assessment of how far it has spread classify that spread as “little or none.” Heres a handy list for your own inspection:

      • Links to Security Firms MyDoom.B Analyses and Remarks on Spread in Wild:

      • Symantec: rates it “Low (0-49);” separately, Symantec Security Response is seeing less than a dozen submission of the B variant
      • Trend Micro: found 1 copy in the wild
      • McAfee: “Low-Profiled”
      • Kaspersky: No comment on distribution
      • Sophos: “At the time of writing, Sophos has received no reports from users affected by this worm.”
      • Panda Software: Distribution: Low
      • Norman Antivirus: LOW RISK
      • Command Software: No comment on distribution
      • F-Secure: LEVEL 2 ALERT (“New virus causing large infections. Might be local to a specific region.”)
      • TrueSecure: No comment on distribution
      • Aladdin Knowledge Systems: Threat Level: Low

      Interesting that even though there was a lot of disagreement on the name of the A variant (MyDoom.A, Novarg.A, MiMail.R, etc.) they all call the B variant MyDoom.B.

      The only company that rates it anything above nothing is F-Secure, a company thats done a bit of scaremongering in the past. But “LEVEL 2” indicates less than it may seem, since the next lowest level of severity, LEVEL 3, describes a virus not necessarily in the wild. In other words, their levels and descriptions are not sufficiently granular.

      Next page: So what will happen on Feb. 3?

      So what will happen


      Feb. 3?”>

      And I did get one big caveat from an analyst I respect. Ken Dunham, director of malicious code for iDefense Inc., reminded me that the availability of the backdoor in both opens some possibilities that are difficult to predict. There could be some unknown capability being introduced through it, and perhaps we just still recognize the mutated infection as a simple MyDoom.A. Its possible, but its also been many days now that experts have had these viruses in their possession and they have been analyzing many honeypot systems. If there were something more going on, I think wed know about it by now. Perhaps theres some important technical flaw in the worm and the companies dont want to discuss it publicly.

      So on Feb. 3, when the B virus launches its planned DDOS attack on www.sco.com and www.microsoft.com, will the world end? It appears that Microsoft has very little to fear. There arent enough infected systems out there to raise a stink, and theres no reason to believe there will be any disruption of service. As for www.sco.com, its already temporarily out to pasture from the MyDoom.A attack, and MyDoom.B wouldnt have changed things much.

      The small number of systems with the infection made me consider the possibility tracing the worm back to the author. If there really are just a few out there, perhaps careful forensic examination of them can identify the initial seeding of the virus and even the source of the initial seeding. I asked Chris Belthoff, senior security analyst at anti-virus company Sophos, who said that—sadly—it doesnt work this way. There are thousands of lesser viruses that dont spread beyond a few systems, and the authors of these typically dont get caught. I guess youd have to make a stupid mistake.

      /zimages/2/28571.gif

      As Netcraft observes in its analysis, Microsoft could be taking defensive measures as it has done in the past, such as giving Akamai or some other content distribution network the front-end duties for serving microsoft.com. The company has not done so. www.microsoft.com still points to a series of Windows servers on IP addresses owned by Microsoft. I guess Microsoft doesnt see all that big a threat either.

      Isnt it interesting that these mass-distribution virus authors usually make some important technical error? The reason, in a very general sense, could be that its not easy to write quality software that can run on a wide variety of systems, even if they are all just different versions of Windows. This is one of the reasons companies have beta tests and hire independent testing firms. Alas, virus writers have a problem in arranging beta tests, and even to the extent that the A variant is a beta for the B and C variants, they dont get all the feedback they would want. Heres to non-standardization!

      Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer has worked in and written about the computer industry since 1983. Be sure to check out eWEEK.coms Security Center at http://security.eweek.com for the latest security news, views and analysis.

      More from Larry Seltzer

      Larry Seltzer
      Larry Seltzer has been writing software for and English about computers ever since—,much to his own amazement—,he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1983.He was one of the authors of NPL and NPL-R, fourth-generation languages for microcomputers by the now-defunct DeskTop Software Corporation. (Larry is sad to find absolutely no hits on any of these +products on Google.) His work at Desktop Software included programming the UCSD p-System, a virtual machine-based operating system with portable binaries that pre-dated Java by more than 10 years.For several years, he wrote corporate software for Mathematica Policy Research (they're still in business!) and Chase Econometrics (not so lucky) before being forcibly thrown into the consulting market. He bummed around the Philadelphia consulting and contract-programming scenes for a year or two before taking a job at NSTL (National Software Testing Labs) developing product tests and managing contract testing for the computer industry, governments and publication.In 1991 Larry moved to Massachusetts to become Technical Director of PC Week Labs (now eWeek Labs). He moved within Ziff Davis to New York in 1994 to run testing at Windows Sources. In 1995, he became Technical Director for Internet product testing at PC Magazine and stayed there till 1998.Since then, he has been writing for numerous other publications, including Fortune Small Business, Windows 2000 Magazine (now Windows and .NET Magazine), ZDNet and Sam Whitmore's Media Survey.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Big Data and Analytics

      Alteryx’s Suresh Vittal on the Democratization of...

      James Maguire - May 31, 2022 0
      I spoke with Suresh Vittal, Chief Product Officer at Alteryx, about the industry mega-shift toward making data analytics tools accessible to a company’s complete...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      Visa’s Michael Jabbara on Cybersecurity and Digital...

      James Maguire - May 17, 2022 0
      I spoke with Michael Jabbara, VP and Global Head of Fraud Services at Visa, about the cybersecurity technology used to ensure the safe transfer...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      GoodData CEO Roman Stanek on Business Intelligence...

      James Maguire - May 4, 2022 0
      I spoke with Roman Stanek, CEO of GoodData, about business intelligence, data as a service, and the frustration that many executives have with data...
      Read more
      Applications

      Cisco’s Thimaya Subaiya on Customer Experience in...

      James Maguire - May 10, 2022 0
      I spoke with Thimaya Subaiya, SVP and GM of Global Customer Experience at Cisco, about the factors that create good customer experience – and...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Yotascale CEO Asim Razzaq on Controlling Multicloud...

      James Maguire - May 5, 2022 0
      Asim Razzaq, CEO of Yotascale, provides guidance on understanding—and containing—the complex cost structure of multicloud computing. Among the topics we covered:  As you survey the...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×