PeopleSoft Takes Oracle to Court

By Lisa Vaas  |  Posted 2003-06-16 Print this article Print

Company also amends its own deal to buy software competitor J.D. Edwards.

PeopleSoft Inc. on Monday amended its deal to buy enterprise software confederate J.D. Edwards and Co. This came after PeopleSoft on Friday filed charges against Oracle Corp., announcing that it wants to put an end to Oracles "sham tender offer" that company officials claim is aimed at "destroying PeopleSofts business." The complaint was filed in Alameda County [Calif.] Superior Court and alleges that Oracles hostile takeover bid, which was launched June 6, represents unfair business practices, trade libel and tortuous interference with PeopleSofts customer relations. The aim of the suit is to secure an injunction barring Oracle from proceeding with its tender offer. The suit alleges that Oracles true intent in making the tender offer was to "undercut PeopleSofts business operations by disparaging PeopleSofts products, services and future prospects; undermine PeopleSofts viability by creating uncertainty and doubt in the minds of PeopleSofts customers and prospective customers; and interfere with PeopleSofts plan to merge with J.D. Edwards & Co."
"By making an offer with the acknowledged intent of eliminating PeopleSofts business, Oracle seeks to disrupt PeopleSofts efforts to complete new sales, thus effectively damaging PeopleSofts business even if Oracle never buys a single share of PeopleSoft stock," said PeopleSoft President and CEO Craig Conway, in a release.
Conway pledged to forge ahead with the merger with J.D. Edwards. "We intend to compete vigorously in the marketplace, and complete the merger with J.D. Edwards, despite Oracles unlawful efforts to destroy competition," he said in the release. Oracle spokesman Jim Finn insinuated that the charges are evidence that PeopleSoft is wishy-washy, given that its flip-flopped on the issue of whether it will file charges against Oracle, or Redwood Shores, Calif. "PeopleSoft seems to have revived its on-again, off-again litigation strategy," he said in a statement. "This matter must be decided by PeopleSoft shareholders and not by frivolous litigation. As for PeopleSofts cryptic reference to its secret discussions with J.D. Edwards, any action by the PeopleSoft board to take the vote away from PeopleSoft shareholders and to further entrench themselves would only compound their abuse of fiduciary duty."

Lisa Vaas is News Editor/Operations for and also serves as editor of the Database topic center. Since 1995, she has also been a Webcast news show anchorperson and a reporter covering the IT industry. She has focused on customer relationship management technology, IT salaries and careers, effects of the H1-B visa on the technology workforce, wireless technology, security, and, most recently, databases and the technologies that touch upon them. Her articles have appeared in eWEEK's print edition, on, and in the startup IT magazine PC Connection. Prior to becoming a journalist, Vaas experienced an array of eye-opening careers, including driving a cab in Boston, photographing cranky babies in shopping malls, selling cameras, typography and computer training. She stopped a hair short of finishing an M.A. in English at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. She earned a B.S. in Communications from Emerson College. She runs two open-mic reading series in Boston and currently keeps bees in her home in Mashpee, Mass.

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters

Rocket Fuel