Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Cloud
    • Cloud
    • Mobile
    • Networking

    FCC NPRM Contains Many Questions, Few Solid Net Neutrality Proposals

    By
    Wayne Rash
    -
    May 17, 2014
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      By now you’ve heard the alarmist stories by various groups claiming that the FCC meeting on May 15 ended network neutrality forever.

      You’ve likely heard the gnashing of teeth by groups with a point of view that FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler was somehow violating his trust as chairman and violating the trust placed in his boss, President Barack Obama, to maintain an open Internet. It should be no surprise by now that those stories and claims are wrong.

      In reality the FCC’s monthly open meeting adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that attempted a nearly impossible balancing act. The NPRM on one hand attempted to keep the Internet free and open to users, while also trying to satisfy a series of requirements and findings by the federal courts that essentially said that the FCC could not require net neutrality under the current rules. The anti-blocking and anti-discrimination provisions of the current broadband rules exceeded the FCC’s authority, the court said.

      The problem began years ago when the FCC attempted to free the Internet from the restrictions of being a common carrier under Section 706 of the Communications Act. Under Title II of the Communications Act, Internet providers were common carriers and were treated as if they were phone companies.

      The change to allow broadband providers of Internet services to be information services rather than common carriers meant that those providers had the flexibility to be more innovative than they would be if they were classified as common carriers. But the new classification as an information service means that common carrier rules can’t apply.

      The problem is to ensure net neutrality, the FCC has to use common carrier rules, and those rules don’t apply to information services. This meant that after the federal courts overturned the FCC’s net neutrality rules in early 2014, carriers were free of those restrictions. As you’d expect, carriers, especially cable companies, wasted no time in finding ways to turn things to their advantage.

      It didn’t take long for those carriers to start blocking or slowing traffic from sites they didn’t like and to start doing pay for priority with services such as Netflix. So what to do? In a significant move, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler decided to ask for help—from everyone.

      This means that there’s little to look at in terms of proposed rules for an Open Internet. Instead, there are discussions of scenarios and page after page of questions. Those questions cover topics from trying to decide what constitutes reasonable network management to whether the FCC should move broadband providers back to common carrier status.

      Make no mistake—moving all or part of the Internet to common carrier status is being strongly considered.

      FCC NPRM Contains Many Questions, Few Solid Net Neutrality Proposals

      “If the commission were to ultimately rely on a source of authority other than section 706 to adopt a legal standard for broadband provider practices, such as Title II,” the commission asks in the NPRM, “we seek comment on whether and, if so, how we should prohibit all, or some, pay-for-priority arrangements, consistent with our authority, to protect and promote Internet openness.”

      What’s missing from the NPRM are some detailed and specific proposals for what the new FCC rules might contain, while still staying within the constraints of the federal courts. “In this notice, we propose to adopt rules to protect and promote the open Internet,” the FCC says in its proposal

      But how the FCC plans to reach this goal is still not clear. Unlike many NPRMs, this one does not really contain much in the way of what the FCC would actually like to do, which is a big change from past practices in which a completed rule was presented for comment. Now the agency is asking for input as to what it should do from anyone with an interest.

      In fact, it almost seems as if the commission is considering a total revamp of how it regulates the big Internet providers. “What factors should the commission keep in mind as it considers whether to revisit its prior decisions? Have there been changes to the broadband marketplace that should lead us to reconsider our prior classification decisions?” the NPRM asks.

      What’s important to remember is that, with this chairman, the emphasis of an NPRM is to let people know that the FCC wants to create a new rule, in this case for regulating the Internet. He also is asking people to tell the commission what they actually want in any rules that are made.

      This is different from past practices in which the rule was made, essentially cast in stone, and then made available for comments. This apparent attempt to find a grand consensus is something new at the FCC.

      As far as to what Tom Wheeler wants, what he says is this: “I strongly support an open, fast and robust Internet. This agency supports an Open Internet. There is ONE Internet. Not a fast Internet, not a slow Internet; ONE Internet.” That doesn’t sound to me like fast lanes for those who can pay and slow lanes for everyone else.

      But it’s what Wheeler says next in his statement on the NPRM that makes it clear that this is a work in progress, “What we are dealing with today is a proposal, not a final rule. With this notice we are specifically asking for input on different approaches to accomplish the same goal: an Open Internet.”

      Wayne Rash
      https://www.eweek.com/author/wayne-rash/
      Wayne Rash is a freelance writer and editor with a 35-year history covering technology. He’s a frequent speaker on business, technology issues and enterprise computing. He is the author of five books, including his most recent, "Politics on the Nets." Rash is a former Executive Editor of eWEEK and a former analyst in the eWEEK Test Center. He was also an analyst in the InfoWorld Test Center and editor of InternetWeek. He's a retired naval officer, a former principal at American Management Systems and a long-time columnist for Byte Magazine.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×