Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications
    • Development
    • Servers

    Eclipse Aims for Smaller, Faster, Simpler

    By
    Darryl K. Taft
    -
    November 7, 2007
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      RESTON, Va.—A major overhaul of the Eclipse code base may be a long time off, but it’s on the minds of some of the leaders of the open-source tools platform.

      During a panel discussion at the EclipseWorld 2007 conference here Nov. 6, some of those leaders—including Mike Milinkovich, executive director of the Eclipse Foundation—spoke hypothetically of an Eclipse 4.0 that would be a significant improvement over the current platform.

      “If we do an Eclipse 4.0, it has to be smaller, faster, simpler” than the Eclipse platform of today, and would have to be “even more maniacally focused on being a platform,” Milinkovich said.

      A new code base was one of several issues addressed by the panel, which also touched upon the current competition in the tools space and Google’s new Android mobile platform.

      Pundits weigh in on Android. Read what they had to say.

      Robert Martin, founder and CEO of Object Mentor, said getting a smaller and simpler Eclipse platform needn’t require a new or clean code base.

      “Improving the code base doesn’t mean that you have to throw out the existing code base and start over,” Martin said. “You want to keep it clean all the time.”

      Milinkovich agreed, saying Eclipse can get to a smaller and faster platform “without starting from scratch.” But serious talk of an Eclipse 4.0 is likely some time off. The last simultaneous release train of 21 Eclipse projects, known as the Europa release, was based on Eclipse 3.3. The next such release train, due at the end of June 2008 and named Ganymede, will not include a major overhaul of the platform, he said. He also invited developers to help the foundation prepare for Ganymede.

      “Eclipse is an open-source community and is only as good as the contributions we get from the community,” Milinkovich said.

      Yet during the panel discussion, he said that a major Eclipse code base overhaul would take “somebody at IBM to say ‘though shalt'” because IBM still contributes the bulk of resources to the code base.

      The panelists also talked about the competitive landscape for IDEs (integrated development environments).

      Asked by the panel’s moderator about other IDE platforms such as Microsoft’s Visual Studio and Sun Microsystems’ NetBeans, Milinkovich said he admires Microsoft’s “singularity of vision.” However, he said Microsoft is in a situation where “they’re sitting on a 10-year-old code base, and there’s such a thing that code can have a ‘best before’ date.” Milinkovich said he could see Microsoft creating a new development platform with a plug-in architecture more akin to Eclipse.

      Martin said that “Microsoft, with Visual Studio, has done a tremendous job of ignoring what developers want … to the extent that IntelliJ [from JetBrains] has been able to carve out a nice market doing tools to make Visual Studio usable.”

      Regarding NetBeans, Milinkovich said Sun does a good job of marketing the things NetBeans does better than Eclipse, such as Java profiling and GUI building with the Matisse technology.

      “I think the thing they oversell themselves on is the platform; Eclipse is clearly superior,” Milinkovich said. That said, “It’s not Eclipse versus NetBeans. That’s an apples and oranges comparison because NetBeans is a Sun product, not an open community. It is a Sun product that they sell support for.”

      David Intersimone, developer evangelist at CodeGear, said his company JBuilder 2007 on Eclipse and the company—then Borland—made the decision to go with Eclipse over NetBeans two years ago.

      “It was Eclipse 3.0 with the plug-in architecture that really cemented it,” he said. “NetBeans just doesn’t add the depth and breadth in terms of frameworks, infrastructure and customer caring.”

      Regarding the Web as a platform, Milinkovich said that while companies like Google are all about the Web and Microsoft is focusing on software plus services, “I think there will be a real convergence in the middle, a blending. And it will become hard to tell when you’re connected or not connected in the browser or outside the browser.”

      On Google’s open-source mobile phone platform and Open Handset Alliance, Milinkovich said that “imitation is the highest form of flattery,” in that the alliance seems to be following an Eclipse-like strategy.

      “We’re big fans of open systems with open operating systems and tools and SDKs [software development kits],” Intersimone said. “I signed up to be notified when the SDK arrives.”

      Check out eWEEK.com’s Application Development Center for the latest news, reviews and analysis in programming environments and developer tools.

      Avatar
      Darryl K. Taft
      Darryl K. Taft covers the development tools and developer-related issues beat from his office in Baltimore. He has more than 10 years of experience in the business and is always looking for the next scoop. Taft is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and was named 'one of the most active middleware reporters in the world' by The Middleware Co. He also has his own card in the 'Who's Who in Enterprise Java' deck.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×