Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications

    Supreme Court Rules for NextWave

    By
    Caron Carlson
    -
    January 27, 2003
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      After spending nearly five years and untold funds in a protracted and contentious legal battle, the Federal Communications Commission lost its bid to repossess spectrum licenses assigned to NextWave Telecom Inc. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that bankruptcy law protects the bankrupt carriers licenses, setting the stage for the long-fallow spectrum to be put to use carrying new wireless services.

      In an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court said that it is irrelevant whether the FCC had a valid regulatory motive for canceling NextWaves licenses. “What petitioners describe as a conflict boils down to nothing more than a policy preference on the FCCs part for (1) selling licenses on credit and (2) canceling licneses rather than asserting security interests when there is a default. Such administrative preferences cannot be the basis for denying NextWave rights provided by the laws plain terms,” Scalia wrote.

      Responding to the ruling, FCC Chairman Michael Powell said that the decision brings much needed certainty to the law. “The Commission will faithfully implement the Courts mandate and looks forward to facilitating the provision of service in these bands to the American people as soon as practicable,” Powell said in a written statement.

      The 8-1 ruling was a major blow to the FCC, which fought vehemently to take back NextWaves licenses, appealing numerous lower court decisions that chided the agency for its stance. Throughout the circuitous battle, the commission took seemingly self-contradicting positions and issued hasty decisions, which caught the industry by surprise, raised the ire of members of Congress and caused at least one commissioner to chastise his own agency.

      The policy missteps began in 1996 with an ill-advised installment payment plan, in which the commission acted as a creditor of sorts to small business bidding on spectrum licensees (known at “C-block” licenses) at auction. NextWave bid $4.7 billion but declared bankruptcy in 1998 and failed to meet its payments. Many of the C-block auction winners, determining that the licenses were over-valued at auction, defaulted on their payments and/or declared bankruptcy.

      During the court proceedings, the commission rejected repeated offers by NextWave to end the wrangling and pay its remaining debt as part of its bankruptcy reorganization. In a move that caught the industry off guard, the commission declared in January, 2000 that NextWaves licenses had “automatically” canceled in 1998. At the end of 2000, in the midst of a very uncertain legal environment, the FCC decided to re-auction the licenses and took bids of approximately $16 billion from the major wireless carriers, including Verizon Communications Inc.

      Perhaps the most questionable move on the part of the FCC throughout the proceedings was a secret agreement to aid Nextel Communications Inc. in a unilateral effort to buy NextWaves licenses out of bankruptcy in 1999. If the licenses had “automatically canceled” in 1998, as the FCC later declared, they could not have been transferred to Nextel in 1999. The House Commerce Committee conducted an inquiry into the secret pact, citing “what appears to be a pattern at the FCC of engaging in closed-door deal-making with private parties on matters that affect public interest.”

      The FCC did not handle all C-Block licensees in the same manner, which angered many in the industry. Some companies that failed to meet payment terms were allowed to continue operating, and not all of the licenses that were deemed to have “automatically canceled” were re-auctioned in 2000.

      Related Stories:

      • Spectrum Push Aimed at WLANs
      • Industry to FCC: Give Us Spectrum
      • Democratic Seat at FCC Filled
      • More Wireless Coverage
      Avatar
      Caron Carlson

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×