Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications

    Unhappy Over Moving Costs

    By
    Carmen Nobel
    -
    June 24, 2002
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      Two years ago, U.S. public safety agencies began having trouble with mobile communications transmissions. The source of the problem, for the most part, was Nextel Communications Corp., which operates radio sites in the same frequencies as the safety agencies, the 800MHz band.

      For a while, the 800MHz problem was just one of the spectrum issues under discussion at the Federal Communications Commission, but the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks pushed public safety to the top of everyones agenda.

      In November, Nextel offered a plan to move affected parties to different parts of the 800MHz band or to other bands. It also offered $500 million to finance some public agencies costs. But the plan is a nightmare for many private network operators, such as FedEx Corp. and Intel Corp., that also use the band.

      The proposal requires corporate wireless users to move their communications off a segment of the 800MHz band at their own cost, and they are not happy. “Its as if your neighbor wants to play a stereo real loud, and you object, so they petition to have you move,” said Nathan Lemmon, chief engineer for wireless systems development at FedEx Corporate Services, in Memphis, Tenn.

      FedExs 750 base stations support 40,000 two-way radios in the 800MHz band, and the company estimates that it would cost $100 million to move to another band. Beyond that, the company said Nextels plan would keep FedEx from communicating in certain regions near the Canadian border.

      FedEx is among companies that wrote letters of complaint to the FCC after the agency issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, or NPRM, in March, explaining the 800MHz problem and including Nextels plan. Because the FCC has already received 200 letters on the issue, it has extended the deadline for responses to the NPRM until next month, when it will begin making a decision.

      Corporate responses in the FCC database mainly echo sentiments such as Intels. “Under Nextels proposal, the total costs to Intel to move its radio systems to the 900MHz band would be more than $4 million, even though these radio systems are not causing interference,” wrote Greg Slater, Intels senior corporate attorney, in Chandler, Ariz. Slater suggested the FCC apply a “last in, fix it” rule that would require Nextel to foot the cost for resolving the whole problem because the problem didnt begin until Nextel started offering its commercial two-way radio and cellular services on the band. Many private incumbents of the band have been there since the late 1970s.

      Even Motorola Inc., which counts Nextel as a major customer of its iDen walkie-talkie phones, filed a 31-page letter warning against the Nextel proposal. Motorola estimated a total cost of $2.8 billion for the industry to follow Nextels plan. “It costs us as much money to relocate to another band as it would public safety [agencies],” said Laura Smith, president and CEO of the Industrial Telecommunications Association, a private network lobbying group in Arlington, Va. “Were just now recovering from a recession. Do we want Americas businesses forking over billions of dollars to move to another band? I dont think so.”

      Complainants have come up with tentative alternative plans, but Nextel maintains that its plan is the quickest and most effective. “It gives public safety a block that they can begin using immediately,” said Leigh Horner, a spokeswoman for Nextel, in Reston, Va. “The problem is going to continue to get worse. Wireless operators are going to continue to meet the demands of their customers.”

      According to some estimates, it will cost public service agencies more than $500 million to follow Nextels plan, but many responses from these agencies to the FCC favor Nextel.

      Critics credit this to Nextels spin doctors. “Nextel is very manipulative,” FedExs Lemmon said. “They know the right strings to pull.”

      The company certainly has bent over backward to ally itself publicly with the public safety community since Sept. 11.

      Nextel was the exclusive underwriter of the CBS documentary “9/11,” the highly publicized account of the World Trade Center attack from French filmmakers Gedeon and Jules Naudet, which aired in March.

      Last month, Nextel announced a strategic alliance with Giuliani Partners LLC to “significantly improve public safety communications across the United States.” The Giuliani in Giuliani Partners is Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York and the champion of the citys public safety efforts in the aftermath of Sept. 11.

      “Theyre taking a wholesale look at how to fix the problem,” Nextels Horner said. “We wouldnt characterize it as lobbying efforts at this point.”

      Private network providers disagree.

      “Nextel is the bad guy here,” FedExs Lemmon said. “But theyre doing their best to have the carrot out there that makes public safety side with them, and once thats out there, theres no way we can win.”

      Carmen Nobel

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      Visa’s Michael Jabbara on Cybersecurity and Digital...

      James Maguire - May 17, 2022 0
      I spoke with Michael Jabbara, VP and Global Head of Fraud Services at Visa, about the cybersecurity technology used to ensure the safe transfer...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Yotascale CEO Asim Razzaq on Controlling Multicloud...

      James Maguire - May 5, 2022 0
      Asim Razzaq, CEO of Yotascale, provides guidance on understanding—and containing—the complex cost structure of multicloud computing. Among the topics we covered:  As you survey the...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×