Close
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Video
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Video
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications
    • IT Management

    How a Federal Trade Secrets Law Would Impact Silicon Valley

    Written by

    Chris Preimesberger
    Published April 7, 2016
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

      Trade secrets are now on a fast track toward a federal identity that would put them on par in the legal world with patents, trademarks and copyrights.

      In what could become a major step toward deterring cyber-crime, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a bill April 4 to empower corporate espionage victims to seek damages for computer-enabled intellectual property theft.

      The Defend Trade Secrets Act (SB 1890) is a bill that would create a federal civil cause of action for trade-secret theft. As of today, trade-secret lawsuits may only be litigated in 47 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; there is no federal jurisdiction.

      The Obama Administration issued a statement indicating its support for the bill, which now awaits approval by the House of Representatives.

      Could Go Far in Deterring Cyber-Crime

      The IT business, not to mention anybody who has ever written a piece of code or set a price margin, should be all for this bill. It potentially is a big step toward deterring cyber-crime, because it empowers corporate espionage victims to seek damages for computer-enabled intellectual property theft on a national and international basis. By enabling corporate victims to recover losses from cyber-enabled IP theft, the bill encourages victims to pursue perpetrators.

      In an op-ed article in Politico, bill sponsors Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Chris Coons (D-Delaware) wrote: “Maintaining the status quo is woefully insufficient to safeguard against misappropriation in today’s fast-paced innovation economy.

      “Trade secrets are the lifeblood of the American economy. Virtually all companies depend on trade secrets to protect their most valuable information and processes. The medical device industry, for example, dedicates enormous resources to the research and development of life-saving products; much of that investment is shielded as trade secrets. Businesses that provide IT infrastructure and data storage—the backbone of the innovation economy—get their competitive edge from proprietary designs and software principally defended by trade secret law.

      “In today’s knowledge- and service-based economy, trade secrets are indispensable to protecting confidential, intangible assets. According to some estimates, trade secrets are worth $5 trillion to the U.S. economy, on par with patents. The loss from their misappropriation is substantial—between $160 billion and $480 billion annually.”

      Like with patents, trademarks and copyrights, trade secret owners may seek redress for intellectual property theft based on a federal statutes in federal court should the bill become law. Additionally, the bill provides for the availability of orders that will allow trade secret owners to have law enforcement seize stolen trade secrets without notice to the misappropriator upon a sufficient showing to the federal court.

      How This Impacts the IT Industry

      Reclaiming stolen software and other amorphous IT trade secrets might be a bit more challenging for law enforcement personnel to accomplish, however. How trade-secret owners describe and safeguard their intellectual property—because trade secrets are simply another form of IP—plays importantly into the entire scenario.

      What exactly is a trade secret, and what sets it apart as a legal entity from copyrights, trademarks and patents?

      According to the World Intellectual Property Association, a trade secret is defined as this: “Any confidential business information which provides an enterprise a competitive edge may be considered a trade secret. Trade secrets encompass manufacturing or industrial secrets and commercial secrets. The unauthorized use of such information by persons other than the holder is regarded as an unfair practice and a violation of the trade secret. Depending on the legal system, the protection of trade secrets forms part of the general concept of protection against unfair competition or is based on specific provisions or case law on the protection of confidential information.

      “The subject matter of trade secrets is usually defined in broad terms and includes sales methods, distribution methods, consumer profiles, advertising strategies, lists of suppliers and clients, and manufacturing processes.”

      Defining ‘Trade Secret’

      The latter statement means that to be legally defined as a “trade secret,” the trade secret needs to be a known fact held within reasonable secrecy guidelines as a way to help a company do its business. The trade secret does not necessarily have to be in written form; read on.

      HG.org, a legal services resource site, says: “Trade secret laws protect any formula, pattern, device, or compilation of information that provides a business advantage over competitors who do not use or know of it. A strategy to increase worker productivity, for example, is a trade secret. Trade secrets do not receive patent protection, because they are not inventive. Trade secret laws are included in intellectual property laws because, like other intellectual property laws, they prevent the unauthorized use of certain intangible subject matter.”

      Trade secrets can be formulas, business ideas or strategies, customer lists, pricing and margins—any type of information, so long as it contains independent economic value and hasn’t been published. Typically, they are tangible, such as a document or digital file, but there is no requirement that they be in writing. It can be as amorphous as a verbal description of how something is done.

      Attorney Robert Milligan of Seyfarth Shaw in Century City, Calif., is co-chair of the firm’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes practice group and has been following the bill since it was introduced in July 2015.

      “This (bill) is very significant in the sense that it puts trade secrets on a similar plane with the other intellectual property assets that a company may hold, and it also may be easier for companies who maintain trade secrets to litigate claims, because now they’re not going to be required to go to state court,” Milligan told eWEEK. “They can navigate in federal court, where discovery may be easier than having to get witnesses and documents from other states, as opposed to using the federal subpoena power.”

      How a Federal Trade Secrets Law Would Impact Silicon Valley

      Supporters of SB 1890 Comprise All Business Sectors

      If you look at the list of supporters for the bill, it runs the gamut of business in the United States: IT, retail, manufacturing, research, financial services, health care and so on. “Trade secrets are what separate competitors in the market, whether that’s pricing, margins, or some sort of secret that the public doesn’t know about in the operation of their business,” Millligan said.

      In the technology sector, some companies are moving away from patent protection because of the limitations of the 20-year monopoly, Milligan said.

      “In patents, the IP owner only has the monopoly for 20 years, whereas with a trade secret, it’s forever, so long as the information is secure,” Milligan said. “You can also license trade secrets as well, subject to non-disclosure agreements. This is welcome among technology companies, if you look at the people who’ve come out in support of it: Intel, Boeing, Adobe, IBM, the Information Technology Council, and so on.”

      Levels of Software Can Be Considered Trade Secrets

      In the software world, Milligan said, certain levels of software can be protected as trade secrets.

      “One of the main requirements of a trade secret are the ‘reasonable secrecy’ measures,” Milligan said. “That’s built in to the definition, whether it’s state law or federal law. What that means is that companies have to do a good job of documenting how they protect that information: Do they designate it as ‘confidential,’ do they describe it in their non-disclosure agreement to their employees and their third-party contractors—whoever can have access to the confidential information.”

      Milligan said that companies should be proactive in inventorying the trade secrets, and making sure they are adequately protecting that information through NDAs and password-protected files that are designated as confidential.

      The idea for the legislation is also to help U.S. companies against the threat of foreign actors, Milligan said.

      “Foreign actors have moles internally in the United States that are trying to acquire trade secrets, and then leave and then have it (the product) mass-produced abroad. It’s trying to address that threat as well—particularly with regard to the EX-Parte Seizure Order,” Milligan said.

      Why EX-Parte Seizure Order is Important

      The EX-Parte Seizure Order is part of the Trade Secrets bill that allows a trade secret owner to obtain an order from a judge for U.S. marshals to seize back the trade secret from the alleged bad actor without prior warning. This is to protect the trade secret owner from having the alleged bad actor skip the country or destroy the evidence before it is recaptured.

      “For instance, a technology company with a foreign national or someone who’s working for the company takes the technology, and you get wind of it that they’ve left the country. The Seizure Order provides you with the ability to get the federal government involved and marshals to seize the misappropriated goods. That’s something that we don’t have right now under the state regime,” Milligan said.

      “You can get an order from the state requiring them to return the property, but in order to get law enforcement involved to seize the goods is something that doesn’t currently exist.”

      In summary, Milligan said: “The creation of a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation is a game changer, and will allow businesses to protect their valuable proprietary information on a nationwide basis in our federal courts. It will allow for more effective remedies to protect trade secrets and more efficient discovery than state court actions. Trade secrets will now join patents, trademarks, and copyrights as valuable intellectual property assets protected by our federal laws.”

      Chris Preimesberger
      Chris Preimesberger
      https://www.eweek.com/author/cpreimesberger/
      Chris J. Preimesberger is Editor Emeritus of eWEEK. In his 16 years and more than 5,000 articles at eWEEK, he distinguished himself in reporting and analysis of the business use of new-gen IT in a variety of sectors, including cloud computing, data center systems, storage, edge systems, security and others. In February 2017 and September 2018, Chris was named among the 250 most influential business journalists in the world (https://richtopia.com/inspirational-people/top-250-business-journalists/) by Richtopia, a UK research firm that used analytics to compile the ranking. He has won several national and regional awards for his work, including a 2011 Folio Award for a profile (https://www.eweek.com/cloud/marc-benioff-trend-seer-and-business-socialist/) of Salesforce founder/CEO Marc Benioff--the only time he has entered the competition. Previously, Chris was a founding editor of both IT Manager's Journal and DevX.com and was managing editor of Software Development magazine. He has been a stringer for the Associated Press since 1983 and resides in Silicon Valley.
      Linkedin Twitter

      Get the Free Newsletter!

      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

      Get the Free Newsletter!

      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Artificial Intelligence

      9 Best AI 3D Generators You Need...

      Sam Rinko - June 25, 2024 0
      AI 3D Generators are powerful tools for many different industries. Discover the best AI 3D Generators, and learn which is best for your specific use case.
      Read more
      Cloud

      RingCentral Expands Its Collaboration Platform

      Zeus Kerravala - November 22, 2023 0
      RingCentral adds AI-enabled contact center and hybrid event products to its suite of collaboration services.
      Read more
      Artificial Intelligence

      8 Best AI Data Analytics Software &...

      Aminu Abdullahi - January 18, 2024 0
      Learn the top AI data analytics software to use. Compare AI data analytics solutions & features to make the best choice for your business.
      Read more
      Latest News

      Zeus Kerravala on Networking: Multicloud, 5G, and...

      James Maguire - December 16, 2022 0
      I spoke with Zeus Kerravala, industry analyst at ZK Research, about the rapid changes in enterprise networking, as tech advances and digital transformation prompt...
      Read more
      Video

      Datadog President Amit Agarwal on Trends in...

      James Maguire - November 11, 2022 0
      I spoke with Amit Agarwal, President of Datadog, about infrastructure observability, from current trends to key challenges to the future of this rapidly growing...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2024 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×