Cable Giants Pass on Spectrum Auction

Cable Giants Pass on Spectrum Auction

Written By
Roy Mark
Roy Mark
Dec 3, 2007
3 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Comcast and Time Warner said Dec. 3 they would not participate in January’s 700 MHz spectrum auction, eliminating two potential powerhouse bidders for the prime airwaves considered ideal for wireless broadband.

Google declared Nov. 30 it would be in the race for the spectrum while AT&T and Verizon, who have not officially stated their intentions, are expected to file by 6 p.m. Dec. 3 to bid on the spectrum.

Meanwhile, Frontline Wireless confirmed with eWEEK that it would bid for a separate block of spectrum with the intention of building a nationwide public safety network that would sell access capacity to wholesalers.

“We are bidding to win and to put into operation the principle of open access and the shared public safety network that we’ve championed from the beginning,” said Mary Greczyn, a spokesperson for Frontline.

Comcast Senior Vice President D’Arcy Rudnay said the Philadelphia-based cable company had no need for additional spectrum. Comcast is the majority partner of SpectrumCo, which spent $2.4 billion last year to win spectrum in the Federal Communications Commission’s advanced wireless services auction.

Read more here about Google’s ultimate goals in the spectrum auction.

“Comcast Corporation has decided not to bid in the 700 MHz wireless auction,” Rudnay said in a statement. “The 20 MHz of spectrum acquired in the wireless auction last year with our cable partners in SpectrumCo provides us with significant long-term flexibility and many strategic options.”

While Google and others pursue the “beachfront” spectrum, where bidding will begin at $4.6 billion, Rudnay said Comcast would “continue to explore how wireless can complement our services through various partnerships and consumer trials.”

Time Warner Cable Chairman and CEO Glenn Britt, speaking at the Global Media & Communications Conference in New York City Dec. 3, said the cable giant is also happy to sit out the bidding in the 700 MHz auction.

“The question has been do consumers, will consumers want to buy cell phone service from the people they buy the triple play from?” Britt said. “So far, we have not seen great demand for that.”

With Comcast and Time Warner out of the picture, speculation for the next two months will focus on a probable bidding war between Google, AT&T and Verizon for the analog space being vacated by broadcasters as part of the digital transition.

The FCC set Dec. 3 as the final deadline for submitting applications to bid, but the agency is not releasing the names for another two weeks or more. Once bidding begins in the Jan. 24 auction, the FCC will not release any information until all bidding is final, which practically means it could be late February or early March before the winners are known.

On top of the minimum $4.6 billion bid, Rick Whitt, Google’s Washington telecom and media counsel, said in September that Google anticipates it could take as much as $12 billion and as long as three years to build a national wireless network from scratch.

Check out eWEEK.com’s Mobile & Wireless Center for the latest news, reviews and analysis on mobile and wireless computing.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.