Microsofts Taxing Plans for Storage

Microsofts Taxing Plans for Storage

Written By
John Taschek
John Taschek
Oct 1, 2001
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Two powerful companies locked in a seemingly tiny skirmish may knock the bottom out of the NAS industry, and theres nothing we can do about it.

It all started with Microsofts SMB (Server Message Block), a file system that Microsoft spearheaded to enable the propagation of Windows into Unix shops. It worked spectacularly, and Windows clients were able to universally talk to Unix systems with a minimum of fuss.

SMB eventually gave way to CIFS—Common Internet File System—and CIFS/SMB has also been reverse- engineered in the form of Samba to allow tighter and faster integration, mainly between Linux clients and Windows.

The problem is that Microsoft is pulling the plug on CIFS compatibility in Exchange. The reason, Microsoft says, is that storing Exchange data over a network creates a bottleneck, slowing the entire system.

The move seriously hampers legitimate NAS (network-attached storage) companies, such as Network Appliance, that depend on CIFS for the Windows-to-high-speed-NAS connection.

Slow performance may be one reason that Microsoft yanked CIFS support. But its probably not a valid one. There are unsubstantiated benchmarks proving that NAS is as fast as direct-attached storage. Soon, well see Transaction Processing Council benchmarks showing that its close, and Network Appliance will be a part of that test.

Another reason that Microsoft may have “unsupported” CIFS is that the company will be altering Exchanges file system and merging it with SQL Servers database file system. That store, in turn, will be used for much more than just e-mail—its the entire file system. But Microsoft also doesnt support NAS for SQL Server. “The use of database devices accessed over the network is not a supported configuration,” says the Microsoft KnowledgeBase.

Why? Oracle runs on Network Appliances devices just fine. The reason, it seems, is that Microsoft wants to control where companies store data. If Microsoft controls the data, it can tap in and extract a tariff in the form of a license fee on every single server that needs to access a Windows system.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.