Do Microsofts Vista Hardware Guidelines Meet the Mark? | eWeek

Do Microsofts Vista Hardware Guidelines Meet the Mark?

Written By
eWEEK EDITORS
eWEEK EDITORS
Aug 4, 2005
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

While the final hardware requirements for Microsofts Windows Vista operating system wont be made public until next summer, testers say the first beta release of the operating system is performing moderately well on existing PC hardware.

Microsoft released to testers the first beta of Vista one week ago. As it has been doing for the past couple of years, Microsoft is declining to specify the minimum hardware requirements for the operating system for now.

Microsoft did offer some general guidelines, saying that Vista beta 1 should run on “a majority of modern computers that can run Windows XP, carry the Designed for Windows XP logo, have a mainstream processor from Intel or AMD, and have 512 MB of RAM,” a Microsoft spokeswoman reiterated this week.

(Comparatively, Microsoft suggests that users have a 300-MHz CPU and 128 MB of RAM to run Windows XP.)

So do Microsofts guidelines meet the mark?

“Beta 1 seems to be working well enough, although Im extremely disappointed in both Microsoft and NVIDIA for not delivering drivers that would enable me to experience [Vistas Aero] Glass [user interface] in its full glory,” said Chris Pirillo, founder of Lockergnome.com and a frequent Microsoft beta tester. “Either 64MB aint enough video RAM, or NVIDIA is incapable of supporting this card with this beta [and possibly future releases]. Frustrating.”

Pirillo said he is testing Beta 1 on a Toshiba Satellite 5105-S701 that originally shipped with XP Home Edition. The system sports an Intel Pentium 4 processor, 512 MB of RAM, and a 60GB hard drive. It also has a 15-inch display and an Nvidia GeForce4 440 Go graphics card with 64MB of video memory.

So far, Vista “doesnt seem to be any faster than XP,” Pirillo said. “Maybe a little slower.”

The bits released on July 27 have yet to be performance-tweaked. Microsoft officials warned the first beta would include little of the final user interface.

/zimages/1/28571.gifClick hereto read more about enterprises concerns about Vistas compatibility.

But Pirillo said that the “Classic Mode interface is beyond unusable,” and called it a “Frankenstein UI.”

“Im going to reserve true judgments until one of the first RCs (final release candidate builds), he said. But “if certain details are still underfinished, Ill scream like a banshee.”

/zimages/1/28571.gifRead the full story on MicrosoftWatch:Do Microsofts Vista Hardware Guidelines Meet the Mark?

/zimages/1/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for Microsoft and Windows news, views and analysis.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.