Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News

      EAC Unit Recommends E-Voting Software Independence

      By
      Wayne Rash
      -
      December 6, 2006
      Share
      Facebook
      Twitter
      Linkedin

        WASHINGTON—The Technical Guidelines Development Committee, a committee appointed by the Election Assistance Commission to study security issues involving electronic voting, voted on Dec. 5 to recommend a move to software independence in voting machines used in the United States.

        Software independence means that election results can be determined independently of whether voting machines have software problems or had their security penetrated.

        An example of such software independence would be with machines that use voter verifiable paper audit trails.

        The committee vote recommended that NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) develop standards for such software independent machines. However, the committee stopped short of recommending that existing machines that are certified under the EACs best practices be decertified.

        A report by the committee said that the current security threats are not sufficiently serious to require jurisdictions remove such machines from use. Instead, the resolution passed by the committee recommends that such standards be developed for future requirements of the EAC.

        “I think its a very significant step by the TGDC,” said Ray Martinez, a policy advisor to the Pew Center on the States, and a former member of the EAC.

        “For the TGDC to weigh in on requiring software independence shows that theres clear momentum. I hope that the TGDC will instruct its staff to move ahead on this.”

        Martinez said that by grandfathering existing machines, election officials will have time to absorb the change, and take the time to develop the voting systems properly.

        “This resolution hit the nail on the head,” said Lawrence Norden, Counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at the NYU School of Law. Norden said that electronic voting machines that do not have a means of auditing have serious vulnerabilities because its impossible to verify that theyve recorded votes properly.

        “Paperless DREs [direct recording election machines] have serious security vulnerabilities because they are not independent of the software,” Norden said.

        He added that the problems reach beyond just election fraud to defective software.

        “To make these systems reliable from software bugs, you need to have some independent means of verifying what the software is telling you,” he said.

        Norden said that the committee resolution sends the right message as to what is important in voting systems security, and it probably will have an impact on future machines.

        He added that whats more important is that the committee vote also highlights the problems of e-voting for legislatures that must pass voting laws.

        /zimages/6/28571.gifClick here to read about the risks of e-voting.

        Norden thinks the resolution by the TGDC will encourage those legislatures to step up their efforts to ensure voting security. “The legislatures will be ahead of the federal agency in charge of this. This will shift the debate even further to make sure that there is a requirement that there is some sort of voter verifiable record.”

        “This is far from over,” Norden cautioned that this is far from over and that the TGDC gets to draft the next iteration of the voting system guidelines based on these recommendations.

        The EAC still has to approve whatever the TGDC comes up with by July, and that will be followed by a public comment period, and this is the first step in something that probably will not come out until March of 2008, Norden said, adding that some types of voting systems that cant be verified or audited, such as the old mechanical lever systems, are already on their way out.

        Despite the fact that secure voting machines may take several years to arrive, Martinez thinks its worth the wait. “This is the issue thats out there, not just with election officials, but with the general public.”

        Martinez said that the TGDC resolution is a very positive move. “What the EAC will do remains to be seen,” he said, “I hope the EAC will take up where the TGDC left off.”

        /zimages/6/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, views and analysis of technologys impact on government and politics.

        Avatar
        Wayne Rash
        Wayne Rash is a freelance writer and editor with a 35 year history covering technology. He’s a frequent speaker on business, technology issues and enterprise computing. He covers Washington and is Senior Columnist for eWEEK. He is the author of five books, including his most recent, "Politics on the Nets". Rash is a former Executive Editor of eWEEK and Ziff Davis Enterprise, and a former analyst in the eWEEK Test Center. He was also an analyst in the InfoWorld Test Center, and Editor of InternetWeek. He's a retired naval officer, a former principal at American Management Systems and a long-time columnist for Byte Magazine.

        MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

        Android

        Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

        Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
        Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
        Read more
        Cloud

        Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

        Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
        Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
        Read more
        Cybersecurity

        How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

        eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
        Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
        Read more
        Big Data and Analytics

        How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

        Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
        There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
        Read more
        Apple

        Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

        Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
        If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
        Read more
        eWeek


        Contact Us | About | Sitemap

        Facebook
        Linkedin
        RSS
        Twitter
        Youtube

        Property of TechnologyAdvice.
        Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

        © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

        Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

        ×