Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News

      Judge Calls for Settlement Talks in Microsoft Trial

      By
      eWEEK EDITORS
      -
      September 28, 2001
      Share
      Facebook
      Twitter
      Linkedin

        WASHINGTON, D.C. – Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly today ordered Microsoft and the government into settlement talks and refused to narrow the scope of possible punishments in the antitrust case.

        Kollar-Kotelly was polite but firm in her debut hearing on the case, and made it clear that an out-of-court settlement is her preference.

        In an order today, Kollar-Kotelly said both sides must “concentrate all of their resources” on settlement talks between now and Nov. 2. It they cant reach a settlement on their own by Oct. 12, Kollar-Kotelly said she will impose a mediator.

        “This case should be settled and this is an optimal time to do so,” Kollar-Kotelly said. “I expect you to engage in discussions around the clock.”

        Kollar-Kotelly was chosen to oversee the 3-year-old landmark case against Microsoft after an appeals court in June overturned an order that the company be broken up and removed the original judge, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, for bias.

        Kollar-Kotelly was ordered to further review some of the claims against Microsoft and to decide appropriate punishment for one Jackson ruling the appeals court agreed with – that Microsoft acted illegally to protect its Windows monopoly.

        During the one-hour procedural hearing, the judge ruled from the bench on Microsofts earlier request to limit consideration of punishments before any evidence had been presented. Microsoft argued that since portions of Jacksons original monopoly ruling were struck down, Kollar-Kotelly should limit the scope of possible remedies to reflect that change.

        Kollar-Kotelly strongly disagreed. “The purpose of evidentiary hearings is to inform the court about the contours of a remedy. The court will not rule on the scope of relief in the abstract,” she said.

        The judge ordered a new schedule for the trial that she said will keep the pace moving as quickly as possible. The Department of Justice will submit its relief proposal on Dec. 7, to be followed by Microsoft on Dec. 12. Hearings in the case will start March 11, unless a settlement is reached. In addition, both sides will conduct evidence discovery Nov. 2 to Feb. 22.

        On this point, Microsoft attorney John Warden asked Kollar-Kotelly for three weeks to deliver documents to the DOJ during discovery, instead of the 10 days she ordered, citing the difficulty in serving up subpoenaed material so quickly.

        Kollar-Kotelly rejected the proposal, pointing out that there were 28 lawyers present in the courtroom for both sides.

        “If you dont want to use these resources, settle the case,” Kollar-Kotelly said.

        All in all ,the day was a rebuke to Microsoft, said Robert Lande, a University of Baltimore antitrust professor. “She wasnt going to let Microsoft delay things,” he said.

        After the hearing, neither Warden nor another Microsoft counsel, William Neukom, had any comment.

        Charles James, the assistant attorney general for the DOJs Antitrust Division, was upbeat. “We are certainly pleased with the courts determinations,” he said.

        Connecticut and Iowa Attorneys General Richard Blumenthal and Tom Miller seconded James remarks.

        Avatar
        eWEEK EDITORS

        MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

        Android

        Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

        Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
        Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
        Read more
        Cloud

        Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

        Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
        Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
        Read more
        Cybersecurity

        How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

        eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
        Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
        Read more
        Big Data and Analytics

        How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

        Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
        There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
        Read more
        Apple

        Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

        Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
        If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
        Read more
        eWeek


        Contact Us | About | Sitemap

        Facebook
        Linkedin
        RSS
        Twitter
        Youtube

        Property of TechnologyAdvice.
        Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

        © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

        Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

        ×