Mark Zuckerberg Just Publicly Disagreed With OpenAI, Anthropic On Slowing Down AI

The Neuron featured image about Meta prioritizing faster AI development over benchmark rankings.

Meta is prioritizing faster AI development over benchmark rankings. Image: The Neuron

Written By
Grant Harvey
Grant Harvey
Jul 30, 2026
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Yesterday we told you that Sam Altman and Dario Amodei backed a petition asking Washington to build the tools to "pace" AI development.

Well, Mark Zuckerberg took out a Wall Street Journal op-ed to go out on his own and say: hard pass.

Here's what happened

  • Zuckerberg argued the US "should accelerate AI development, not restrict it," and said the real risk isn't AI moving too fast, it's "superintelligence" (AI that outperforms humans at most tasks) ending up locked inside a handful of labs.
  • He said distributing powerful AI broadly would create more jobs and make it easier to start a business without raising huge amounts of money, not fewer jobs as critics fear.
  • He also pushed back on banning Chinese open-weight AI models (models anyone can download and modify for free), calling it unlikely to actually work.
  • The op-ed landed the same week OpenAI and Anthropic officially endorsed a petition from 1,224 frontier-lab employees asking governments to build "the technical and governance tools" to slow AI down if it starts improving itself faster than anyone can supervise.

Why this matters

This is the clearest public split yet between two camps forming across Silicon Valley.

Meta, Nvidia, Microsoft, and Elon Musk have been championing open, fast-moving AI. OpenAI and Anthropic, the same companies racing hardest to build the most powerful models, are now the ones publicly asking regulators to install brakes. If you work anywhere AI touches your job (so, everywhere), this argument over speed vs. caution is about to shape the actual rules you operate under, not just the headlines you scroll past.

Our take

Here's the detail nobody's talking about: Meta's own chief AI scientist, Shengjia Zhao, personally signed the pacing petition, the same one his boss just spent an entire op-ed arguing against. Most corporate disagreements happen between rival CEOs. This one's happening under the same roof.

Worth asking: when the people closest to the frontier keep hedging their own bosses' bets, is that a coincidence, or a signal? Anyway, I got around to publishing his full thoughts on this. Check out my hot take on to pace or not to pace here.

Advertisement

Editor’s note: This article originally appeared on our sister publication, The Neuron.

Grant Harvey

Grant Harvey is the Lead Writer of The Neuron, where he continues to lead the publication's daily coverage of AI news, tools, and trends.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.