Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News

      Paid-Search Credibility Comes Under Fire

      By
      Matthew Hicks
      -
      June 10, 2005
      Share
      Facebook
      Twitter
      Linkedin

        BERKELEY, Calif.—When it comes to their advertising relationships, are the Webs top search engines disclosing enough information?

        Consumer advocates, search-engine marketers and representatives of the engines themselves debated that question during a Consumer Reports WebWatch conference held here on Thursday, and their answers varied widely.

        Consumer groups called for more disclosure about paid listings, while others in the search-engine industry turned the spotlight on less-visible practices used to rank high in results. But most agreed that trust is critical to search engines and that those that follow the most credible practices will win over consumers.

        “People are using search engines for everything,” said Jorgen Wouters, a consultant for Consumer Reports WebWatch. “Consumers have a right to know if theyre receiving unbiased information or if someone is paying for it.”

        As part of the conference, Consumer Reports WebWatch released its latest search disclosure study in which it found that eight of the 15 most visited search sites have made their disclosures about so-called sponsored links less visible to consumers.

        Headings labeling sponsored links, which are advertisements sold in an auction model and paid based on the number of clicks, have largely gone from bold colors to more dull designs since the time of the groups last report in November. Meanwhile, those sites using paid inclusion, where a Web site pays a search engine to be part of its index, continue to provide little disclosure, the report found.

        Among the five major search sites—Google Inc., Yahoo Inc., MSN, America Online Inc. and Ask Jeeves Inc.—Yahoo and Ask Jeeves were cited for making their headings fainter and their disclosure statements harder to find.

        “If you want to call attention to something on a page you put headline above it, [but] you dont make it smaller and more faint,” said Beau Brendler, director of Consumer Reports WebWatch.

        Yahoo also received the most criticism about its paid inclusion program, since it is the only engine among the top five to still use the practice, and because one way it charges included sites is based on the number of clicks on their listings.

        /zimages/6/28571.gifClick here to read more about the industrys debate over paid inclusion.

        While consumer advocates focused on paid inclusion programs and how well search engines disclose their ads, many of the search-engine marketers said that other issues are having a bigger influence on the search results.

        All search consumers need to realize that search results—both paid listings and the organic results returned through algorithms—are being influenced, said Dana Todd, an executive vice president and search marketer for SiteLab International Inc.

        Marketers are willing to pay search-engine optimization and marketing firms to help rank higher in search results. And if search engines offer ways to buy ads or be included in their results, marketers will pay, she said.

        “Id happily buy everything out there,” said Todd, who is also president of the Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization. “Thats my job … There is going to have to be a balance, and we cant be so naive as to say that there isnt money be exchanged.”

        Even for engines like Google, which have strict policies against paid inclusion, sites are finding ways to game the results.

        Dan Thies, president of search-keyword researcher SEO Research Labs, explained examples where more obscure search terms return what he called “keyword driftnets.” Those are sites packed with specific keywords that appear designed to draw people to click on syndicated ads from Googles program for Web publishers, called AdSense.

        “I wonder if it isnt time for search engines to start saying that they can be gamed by scammers, and so can you,” Thies said.

        /zimages/6/28571.gifRead more here about one site accused of using keyword-laden articles to spam Google.

        While other practices may be influencing search engines, Wouters said that too many consumers still remain uninformed about how the more common paid listings work, both for sponsored links and for paid inclusion.

        “What we take for granted, a lot of people dont have any idea that its going on,” said Wouters, the author of Consumer Reports WebWatchs latest report.

        Next Page: Customization may be the answer for consumers.

        Customization May Be the


        Answer”>

        For advertisers themselves, better labeling and disclosure of sponsored listings would not necessarily hurt them. Fewer consumers might click on the sponsored links if they were more clearly labeled, but those that did click likely would be better leads for the advertisers, Thies said.

        “As an advertiser myself, I would much prefer that people clicking on my ad know its an advertisement,” he said.

        The labeling of paid inclusion listings, though, could have a different effect because of the negative perception consumers may have about listings, said Mike Moran, a distinguished engineer at IBM who has authored a book on search engines. Consumer advocates favor the labeling of each search result coming from paid inclusion.

        One reason paid inclusion programs exist is because search-engine crawlers are unable to index every Web page and to do so as soon as new sites come online or changes are made, Moran said.

        “Disclosure isnt something thats pain-free,” he said. “Whats the capacity of people to understand [paid inclusion] and make a good judgment?”

        /zimages/6/28571.gifClick here to read about a new Google program for letting Webmasters submit site information for free.

        As search evolves, though, the influence of ads, paid inclusion and gaming techniques could shift dramatically. Already, some sites are beginning to give individual users more control over the search results they see.

        Danny Sullivan, editor of Search Engine Watch, demonstrated a newer feature in Yahoos search results that lets users block specific sites from future results. The blocking feature is part of Yahoos My Web personalized search service.

        Other engines, including Google and Ask Jeeves, are moving toward personalization. Eventually, search results will become more and more unique to individuals, Moran said.

        “In the next few years, there will be no such thing as a No. 1 result,” Moran said. “If you think its complicated now, you aint seen nothing yet.”

        /zimages/6/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, views and analysis on enterprise search technology.

        Matthew Hicks
        As an online reporter for eWEEK.com, Matt Hicks covers the fast-changing developments in Internet technologies. His coverage includes the growing field of Web conferencing software and services. With eight years as a business and technology journalist, Matt has gained insight into the market strategies of IT vendors as well as the needs of enterprise IT managers. He joined Ziff Davis in 1999 as a staff writer for the former Strategies section of eWEEK, where he wrote in-depth features about corporate strategies for e-business and enterprise software. In 2002, he moved to the News department at the magazine as a senior writer specializing in coverage of database software and enterprise networking. Later that year Matt started a yearlong fellowship in Washington, DC, after being awarded an American Political Science Association Congressional Fellowship for Journalist. As a fellow, he spent nine months working on policy issues, including technology policy, in for a Member of the U.S. House of Representatives. He rejoined Ziff Davis in August 2003 as a reporter dedicated to online coverage for eWEEK.com. Along with Web conferencing, he follows search engines, Web browsers, speech technology and the Internet domain-naming system.

        MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

        Big Data and Analytics

        Alteryx’s Suresh Vittal on the Democratization of...

        James Maguire - May 31, 2022 0
        I spoke with Suresh Vittal, Chief Product Officer at Alteryx, about the industry mega-shift toward making data analytics tools accessible to a company’s complete...
        Read more
        Cybersecurity

        Visa’s Michael Jabbara on Cybersecurity and Digital...

        James Maguire - May 17, 2022 0
        I spoke with Michael Jabbara, VP and Global Head of Fraud Services at Visa, about the cybersecurity technology used to ensure the safe transfer...
        Read more
        Applications

        Cisco’s Thimaya Subaiya on Customer Experience in...

        James Maguire - May 10, 2022 0
        I spoke with Thimaya Subaiya, SVP and GM of Global Customer Experience at Cisco, about the factors that create good customer experience – and...
        Read more
        Cloud

        IGEL CEO Jed Ayres on Edge and...

        James Maguire - June 14, 2022 0
        I spoke with Jed Ayres, CEO of IGEL, about the endpoint sector, and an open source OS for the cloud; we also spoke about...
        Read more
        Big Data and Analytics

        GoodData CEO Roman Stanek on Business Intelligence...

        James Maguire - May 4, 2022 0
        I spoke with Roman Stanek, CEO of GoodData, about business intelligence, data as a service, and the frustration that many executives have with data...
        Read more
        Logo

        eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

        Facebook
        Linkedin
        RSS
        Twitter
        Youtube

        Advertisers

        Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

        Advertise with Us

        Menu

        • About eWeek
        • Subscribe to our Newsletter
        • Latest News

        Our Brands

        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms
        • About
        • Contact
        • Advertise
        • Sitemap
        • California – Do Not Sell My Information

        Property of TechnologyAdvice.
        © 2022 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

        Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

        ×