States Strategist: ISVs Must Adapt

States Strategist: ISVs Must Adapt

Written By
Darryl K. Taft
Darryl K. Taft
May 1, 2002
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a video deposition taped last month, a key strategist for the states in the Microsoft Corp. remedy case said hed met with Microsoft competitors to help craft the states remedy proposal and called it “tough luck” for ISVs if certain pieces of essential Windows code is missing from implementations delivered under the proposed decree.

During the deposition played in court Tuesday, Tom Greene, senior assistant attorney general of California, told Microsoft attorney Steven Holley he had met with representatives from AOL Time Warner Inc., Oracle Corp. and ProComp to help draft modifications to the non-settling states remedy proposal. ProComp is an anti-Microsoft trade association made up of Microsoft competitors including Sun Microsystems Inc. and Oracle.

During a discussion over interdependencies between various components of Microsoft middleware and the operating system, Holley asked Greene: “So if Intuits Quicken uses Internet Explorer to render its user interface, its just their tough luck if Internet Explorer is not present in the unbound version?”

Greene replied: “Well, yes, I think thats right. One of the problems here is that one of the aspects of the barrier to entry is that its so much easier to write applications to Windows, that if those APIs, etc., associated with Microsoft middleware products are left in, then there will be relatively little incentive for people to write for other platforms.”

That would make it difficult to create a strong market “for intermediary kinds of middlewares that would allow people like Intuit to write both to the Microsoft product as well as Plle or Linux or Unix or some other OS,” Greene said.

He said ISVs such as Intuit might have to redistribute pieces of Windows in addition to their products to accommodate for whatever might be lacking in various unbound implementations of Windows.

Greene also stated that Microsoft would be responsible for testing all the various iterations of Windows that could be made under the decree. Microsoft also would be relied upon for support, he said.

Related stories:

  • Microsoft, States Clash Over Witness
  • States Target Qwest, Microsoft Relationship
  • Gates to Court: States Remedy Would Ban Windows
  • Special Report: Microsoft vs. DOJ
eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.