Close
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Video
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Video
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Blogs Google Watch
    • Blogs
    • Google Watch
    • Search Engines

    Why Antitrust Regulators Should Bless Googleola Bid

    Written by

    Clint Boulton
    Published August 16, 2011
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

      Google’s $12.5 billion acquisition offer for Motorola set off the normal rounds of pontification such blockbuster proposals tend to send off.

      While pundits analyze to death the ins and outs and ramifications of the deal, antitrust regulators on Capitol Hill are likely preparing for this new headache, as Google is proving to be an increasingly sharp thorn in their sides.

      Google has gotten so large — 30,000 employees, $39 billion in cash, and as much as 95 percent of the search market in some countries overseas (65 percent in the U.S.) — that the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department would be criminally negligent if they failed to scrutinize all of the company’s large acquisitions.

      At least, that’s the way it feels to those who watch Google closely.

      That includes Google’s bid for YouTube, which at $1.65 billion passed relatively easily.

      Google followed that big buy with its largest acquisition to date in DoubleClick for $3.2 billion, which the FTC reviewed for nearly a year before it closed in March 2008.

      In 2009, Google agreed to buy mobile ad network AdMob for $750 million, a deal the FTC reportedly agonized over — and weathered stinging criticism for its failure to competently grok the niche — before blessing it in May 2010.

      Google in July 2010 agreed to buy travel search data purveyor ITA Software for $700 million. The DOJ took that one, and took its sweet time blessing it — waiting until April 2011 to greenlight it.

      Even now, the DOJ is reportedly parsing Google’s bid for ad optimization provider AdMeld for a relatively pedestrian $400 million.

      So to say Google is keeping regulators busy like no other high-tech company is an understatement. It’s making Microsoft look like a startup in this regard.

      Now here’s the latest bid for Motorola, the struggling phone maker that put Android on the map and is one of the top sellers of Android handsets in the U.S. and Canada. The FTC and/or DOJ would be derelict in their duties if they did not address this latest bid.

      I think it begs investigation … but it also should be passed. This isn’t a horizontal merger — Google buying Bing or Yahoo, which the FTC proved it would stop after it blocked Google’s bid to simply partner with it in search in 2008.

      The FTC and DOJ like to halt deals where companies try to add more apple trees to their orchards, to use a fruit analogy. The only hardware Google sells includes search appliances for businesses, making this a so-called vertical acquisition.

      Rather, this is a defensive maneuver to grant Google possession of 17,000 and counting wireless and other non-essential patents at a time when Apple and Microsoft have turned increasingly litigious to stop the rise of Android at OEMs Motorola, Samsung and HTC, among others.

      The deal has some ancillary benefits, too. Google may be able to parlay into bolstering its core businesses, such as the possible integration of Google TV within Motorola set-top boxes, and the ability to more tightly integrate Android with hardware made by Motorola.

      But this deal is about Google saving Android’s future. If regulators oppose the deal, they would be betraying their bias toward Google, which has become a blatantly greedy Internet company.

      That’s my opinion, and others disagree. You know, those from the anti-Google camps. Consumer Watchdog said:

      “Do you want the mobile phone information monopolist (through its Android operating system and apps) to own a principle mobile manufacturer and its patent technology? To be sure, monopolies look different in the Internet age. But what Google has over all of us is the world’s largest repository of private information ever assembled because it tracks every Web site we visit and every search we make. Should an information monopolist like Google have the power to dominate cell phone manufacturing and control patents that could require mobile phones to use its information-tracking Android operations and applications? The debate has just begun.“

      The American Consumer Institute, meanwhile, offered this concern:

      “The latest announcement by Google is just one of over one hundred acquisitions by the company and it emphasizes a worrisome pattern of conduct. There are allegations that Google has pressured cell phone manufacturers not to use competing operating systems, and the latest deal could effectively lockout competition. In addition, the FTC recently announced remedies with Google for its deceptive privacy practices, and numerous law enforcement agencies and attorneys general have targeted the company over its ‘Spy-Fi’ practices. While in the midst of deflecting privacy charges over the acquisition of location-based data off of customer mobile phones, adding a large cell phone company to its empire will surely serve to echo those same privacy concerns and demand Google to answer further questions about the privacy of its consumers.“

      Notice a pattern here? Both the Consumer Watchdog and ACI broached “what ifs” were Google to get Motorola. They don’t look at it from the practical perspective of how Motorola patents would help Google defend a business under fire.

      Rather, they look at how Google could use Motorola phones as devices to bolster its information-grabbing empire and further abuse the privacy of its users.

      Nice misdirection, eh? It’s alarmist, sure, but they can’t well attack it for trying to grab more IP and save its mobile software business, can they?

      Clint Boulton
      Clint Boulton

      Get the Free Newsletter!

      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

      Get the Free Newsletter!

      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Artificial Intelligence

      9 Best AI 3D Generators You Need...

      Sam Rinko - June 25, 2024 0
      AI 3D Generators are powerful tools for many different industries. Discover the best AI 3D Generators, and learn which is best for your specific use case.
      Read more
      Cloud

      RingCentral Expands Its Collaboration Platform

      Zeus Kerravala - November 22, 2023 0
      RingCentral adds AI-enabled contact center and hybrid event products to its suite of collaboration services.
      Read more
      Artificial Intelligence

      8 Best AI Data Analytics Software &...

      Aminu Abdullahi - January 18, 2024 0
      Learn the top AI data analytics software to use. Compare AI data analytics solutions & features to make the best choice for your business.
      Read more
      Latest News

      Zeus Kerravala on Networking: Multicloud, 5G, and...

      James Maguire - December 16, 2022 0
      I spoke with Zeus Kerravala, industry analyst at ZK Research, about the rapid changes in enterprise networking, as tech advances and digital transformation prompt...
      Read more
      Video

      Datadog President Amit Agarwal on Trends in...

      James Maguire - November 11, 2022 0
      I spoke with Amit Agarwal, President of Datadog, about infrastructure observability, from current trends to key challenges to the future of this rapidly growing...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2024 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×