Security Highlights and Lowlights of 2003

Some good things happened in computer security over the past year. But in this field, it's really the bad news that's important, observes Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer, taking a look at mostly the bad of 2003.

The consensus among security professionals is solid: 2003 was a lousy year for computer security. And the news wont be much better in the year ahead; things are trending for the worse.

While its easy to focus on the security screw-ups of 2003—since there are so many more of them—Ill also try to dredge up some good news. And here they are, the good things that happened in computer security in 2003:

  • Despite all the security mishaps of 2003, the overwhelming evidence shows that if youre informed and diligent you can keep your systems relatively safe from attack. Try to get all the information you can, from here at eWEEK.coms Security Center, as well as from commercial, high-end offerings such as Symantecs DeepSight Alert and Threat Management Services.

In addition, implement patch management, aggressively block services at the firewall and use intrusion detection where services are open. The bad guys can still get to you, but it will be hard.

  • Since its clear that most users dont apply patches even when they are heavily publicized as being critical, Microsoft began to move towards the default download and installation of security patches. There are problems with this of course, but there are bigger problems with not doing it. This alone should, over some time, improve overall security on the Internet.
  • Microsoft recently began to withdraw support for and sale of Windows NT4 and Windows 98 (and many other obsolete products. Many of these products are more difficult to fix than current software or have problems which cant be fixed, such as Outlook 97.

Next page: And now for the bad news ...