U. S. Web Face Too Public?

U. S. Web Face Too Public?

Written By
Caron Carlson
Caron Carlson
Oct 17, 2003
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

WASHINGTON—The Bush administration has made e-government one of its top priorities, encouraging citizens, for example, to file taxes and renew licenses online. But some security experts are questioning whether that initiative, which links federal systems to home and office computers, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of the nations cyber-infrastructure.

The U.S. House of Representatives recently approved legislation to limit peer-to-peer networking on government computers, and now members of Congress are talking about taking more drastic steps, even removing public-facing Web sites from government networks.

The legislative momentum is fueled by the IT security industry, and companies such as Akamai Technologies Inc., in Cambridge, Mass., and NetSec Inc. are urging the government to play a more prominent role in promoting a safer cyber-environment.

“By serving the content externally, the public no longer needs direct access to the government network, and it is much easier to filter out attack traffic,” Akamai Chief Scientist F. Thomson Leighton told lawmakers. Leighton did not specify which nongovernment network might handle the governments public-facing material, but one possibility is Akamais network.

Leighton and NetSec President Kenneth Ammon related a litany of security problems on the Internet during a hearing of the House Government Reform Committee here last week, warning that the infamous Code Red and Blaster viruses are still active and that attack traffic is growing.

Warning that the governments certification procedures offer little value when applied to existing computer systems and that there is no objective measure of an agencys security performance, Ammon urged lawmakers to outsource more security systems to private companies.

Ammon, based in Herndon, Va., also criticized the governments attention to security in federal wireless LANs, calling the system a “steel door/grass hut approach to security.”

Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., who chairs the committee, questioned last week whether average computer users know what software they run, where to find a patch and how to apply it. The government, too, has a less-than-stellar record for making IT security policy, Davis said. “The Internet is inherently a breeding ground for malevolent actors,” Davis said during the hearing.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.