Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications
    • Servers

    Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: Microsoft and Open Standards

    By
    Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
    -
    November 22, 2005
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      Kids know that when one kid lies all the time, the next thing out of his mouth is likely to be another lie.

      So whats the IT buying publics excuse for thinking Microsofts new embrace of openness is anything other than a lie?

      Its one thing for Microsoft to declare that it will open up its Office XML file formats and have them be recognized as a formal standard by Ecma. Its another thing entirely for this so-called standard to be a real open standard.

      After all, this isnt the first, or even second, time that Microsoft has tried to con people into believing that it supports open standards.

      A few years back, Microsoft announced that it was going to support the open network authentication protocol Kerberos. What it didnt announce was that it was adding its own proprietary extensions to it. That made it impossible to use Microsofts Kerberos with the truly standard-compliant versions.

      The funniest thing about the whole, sad mess was when Microsoft announced that, it would open the specification… but to see it you had to accept a license agreement that included the phrase, “The Specification is confidential information and a trade secret of Microsoft.”

      In short, you could see it, but you couldnt use it. Now, thats “open.”

      Microsoft uses a similar theme with its MCPP (Microsoft Communications Protocol Program) to keep open-source programmers out of its server protocols, which it was forced to open up by the Department of Justice. Here, you can use the protocols, but only if you dont use them under an open-source license.

      More recently, Microsoft agreed to try to settle a European Commissions antitrust ruling by opening up some server protocols… in a way that kept GPLed open-source programs from using them.

      Detect a certain theme here? I think 5-year olds could.

      Now, lets move to the present time.

      Thanks to the truly open OpenDocument standard, Microsoft is actually in danger for the first time in years of losing some Office customers. Microsoft is running scared, so theyre going back to their tried and true bag of tricks.

      Microsoft isnt announcing the exact details of its new license until Wednesday, but I dont have to see it to know there will be a drop of poison in it. After all, there always has been before.

      You can already see some of it coming.

      Microsofts proposed open standards are all about how to write to its Office formats, not how to read them. If you dont think thats a big deal, youve never worked with HTML and Internet Explorer.

      /zimages/2/28571.gifA new Linux study suggests fundamental Microsoft credibility problems. Click here to read more.

      Heck, this isnt even the first time that Microsoft has claimed that its Office XML formats were open. Brian Jones, an Office program manager who works on XML, claimed that the existing licenses for Office Open XML formats are, broadly speaking, open-source compatible, but even he admitted that “The patent language is difficult to read.”

      I think this older license is clear as glass.

      The relevant line reads: “Microsoft may have patents and/or patent applications that are necessary for you to license in order to make, sell, or distribute software programs that read or write files that comply with the Microsoft specifications for the Office Schemas.”

      In other words, its an open standard so long as you license our patents, or any patents we might get. Royalty free patents or not, thats still trouble for any developer. For GPL developers, its a complete deal breaker.

      Boy, thats open.

      Im as certain there will be similar language in Microsofts new open standard as a kindergartener is certain that a kid who lies and is selfish with his toys yesterday will be exactly the same way today.

      Ziff Davis Internet Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been working and writing about technology and business since the late 80s and thinks he may just have learned something about them along the way.

      /zimages/2/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.

      Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
      I'm editor-at-large for Ziff Davis Enterprise. That's a fancy title that means I write about whatever topic strikes my fancy or needs written about across the Ziff Davis Enterprise family of publications. You'll find most of my stories in Linux-Watch, DesktopLinux and eWEEK. Prior to becoming a technology journalist, I worked at NASA and the Department of Defense on numerous major technological projects.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×