Close
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News
    • Servers

    Lindows Wins a Big One in Windows Trademark Suit

    By
    Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
    -
    May 24, 2004
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday denied Microsofts appeal that the term “windows” be considered only as it is understood by the public today—not as it was when the companys Windows was introduced in 1985—as the companys trademark litigation against Lindows continues.

      The case has been sent back for trial to Judge John Coughenour of the U.S. District Court in Seattle, who issued the order that Microsoft Corp. was appealing.

      Lindows Inc. has been battered in its most recent legal go-arounds with Microsoft. Its been forced to change its name in some areas of business from Lindows to Linspire.

      It has also had to defend itself against numerous Microsoft legal actions in Europe. But according to lawyers familiar with the case, this latest decision bodes well for the desktop Linux distributor.

      “Were looking forward to getting this trial back on the fast track and presenting our piles of evidence—videos, magazines, internal Microsoft documents—which clearly show the generic use of windows before Microsoft commandeered the word,” Lindows CEO Michael Robertson said in a statement.

      “This outright denial of Microsofts appeal confirms that the trial will focus on how consumers and the software industry used the term windows in the 1980s, before Microsoft dominated the landscape.”

      Michael R. Graham, intellectual property attorney and partner with Chicago-based law firm Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, said he considers this a major move in the ongoing legal war between Microsoft and San Diego-based Lindows.

      “Although it is merely a straightforward denial of Microsofts petition for permission to appeal, this is a significant decision,” Graham said. “And one which substantially strengthens Lindows/Linspires challenge of the Windows trademark.

      “This ruling is vital to Lindows/Linspires case because if a term is generic, or once it becomes generic, trademark law holds that no amount of advertising or exclusivity of use can make that term a protectable trademark,” Graham said.

      The company “hopes to prove that prior to the adoption of Windows by Microsoft, windowing and windows were used for a particular feature of computer graphic user interfaces: namely, the ability to open files within so-called windows and of opening multiple windows on the computer screen to work on different programs or files.

      “Although Microsoft owns numerous registrations for trademarks which include the Windows designation, it only gained these without disclaiming exclusive rights in the Windows term by claiming that the term has gained trademark distinctiveness by reason of its advertising, marketing and sale of goods under the mark, a so-called Sec. 2(f) basis,” Graham said.

      “But if the jury determines that the windows term was not only merely descriptive, but was in fact generic prior to Microsofts use of the term, then no amount of advertising, sales or secondary meaning would entitle Microsoft to monopolize the generic term,” he said. “Thus, this is an important victory for Lindows and a defeat for Microsoft.”

      Next Page: The ruling could wind up having much larger implications for Microsoft.

      Larger Implications

      Glenn Peterson, intellectual property attorney and shareholder with the Sacramento-based law firm McDonough Holland & Allen PC, agreed when he said, “The denial of Microsofts appeal does not bode well for its trademark infringement case directed at Lindows.”

      “The trial judge has made it clear that this case will be controlled by whether windows was a generic term at the time Microsofts Windows 1.0 entered the market in November 1985,” Peterson said.

      “The judge made clear that this issue would be controlling at trial and also made clear that he would instruct the jury that generic-ness should be determined by the circumstances existing prior to Windows 1.0 going to market.

      “The judge went even further, however, and stated that he would not instruct the jury that, if windows was a generic term prior to November 1985, Microsoft could still have a protectable trademark so long as the primary significance of the term wasnt generic.

      “Stated in plain English, this just means that the generic term originally was understood to refer to something else, but now everyone knows it refers to Microsofts products,” Peterson said.

      “Combined, these statements by the judge make indelibly clear that, if Windows is found by the jury to be generic prior to November 1985, then it cannot be the subject of trademark protection under any circumstances.”

      Thats bad news for Microsoft, but Peterson said he thinks theres worse in store for the Redmond, Wash., software giant.

      “Heres the really daunting aspect for Microsoft: If it is determined in this trial that windows is a generic term, then Microsofts Windows and Windows-related trademarks are invalid—i.e., they cant be enforced under any circumstances,” he said.

      “This means much more than a win for Linux. It means a hall pass for all competitors in the software marketplace. Stated simply, any person or company who wishes to utilize windows in their name or marketing material would be free to do so without fear of suit by Microsoft.

      “In the final analysis, this would mean a small win for Linux, because its rights will be no greater than the general publics, but a huge loss for Microsoft,” Peterson said.

      “This is what happened to nylon and teflon. They used to be trademarks but became generic. Today, you can go into any department store and find hundreds of products that use those words on their labels and packaging.

      “This is also why Xerox would prefer that you ask for a photocopy instead of a Xerox copy,” he said. “Trademarks can become generic through common usage.

      “In the Microsoft case, Lindows is arguing the converse scenario, i.e., that windows was generic before Microsoft adopted it—Linus [Torvalds] is fond of saying commandeered it—as a trademark.”

      Peterson said he doubts that the case will go to trial. If it does, he said, “It will become a zero-sum game for the contestants. One side will lose big, and the inevitable appeal that follows will become as familiar to software purveyors as Roe v. Wade is to law students. I will not be surprised at all to hear a settlement announced before Thanksgiving this year.”

      If it does go to court, the trial is on a timetable to take place in the second half of 2004 in Seattle, with Coughenour presiding. The trial is expected to last about two weeks, with each side having one week to present its case.

      Witnesses already designated to testify include Bill Gates, Microsofts chairman and chief software architect; Steve Ballmer, the companys president and CEO; and Lindows Michael Robertson.

      Check out eWEEK.coms Linux & Open Source Center at http://linux.eweek.com for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.

      Be sure to add our eWEEK.com Linux news feed to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo page

      Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
      I'm editor-at-large for Ziff Davis Enterprise. That's a fancy title that means I write about whatever topic strikes my fancy or needs written about across the Ziff Davis Enterprise family of publications. You'll find most of my stories in Linux-Watch, DesktopLinux and eWEEK. Prior to becoming a technology journalist, I worked at NASA and the Department of Defense on numerous major technological projects.
      Get the Free Newsletter!
      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis
      This email address is invalid.
      Get the Free Newsletter!
      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis
      This email address is invalid.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Latest News

      Zeus Kerravala on Networking: Multicloud, 5G, and...

      James Maguire - December 16, 2022 0
      I spoke with Zeus Kerravala, industry analyst at ZK Research, about the rapid changes in enterprise networking, as tech advances and digital transformation prompt...
      Read more
      Applications

      Datadog President Amit Agarwal on Trends in...

      James Maguire - November 11, 2022 0
      I spoke with Amit Agarwal, President of Datadog, about infrastructure observability, from current trends to key challenges to the future of this rapidly growing...
      Read more
      Applications

      Kyndryl’s Nicolas Sekkaki on Handling AI and...

      James Maguire - November 9, 2022 0
      I spoke with Nicolas Sekkaki, Group Practice Leader for Applications, Data and AI at Kyndryl, about how companies can boost both their AI and...
      Read more
      Cloud

      IGEL CEO Jed Ayres on Edge and...

      James Maguire - June 14, 2022 0
      I spoke with Jed Ayres, CEO of IGEL, about the endpoint sector, and an open source OS for the cloud; we also spoke about...
      Read more
      IT Management

      Intuit’s Nhung Ho on AI for the...

      James Maguire - May 13, 2022 0
      I spoke with Nhung Ho, Vice President of AI at Intuit, about adoption of AI in the small and medium-sized business market, and how...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2022 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×