Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home IT Management
    • IT Management
    • Networking
    • Servers

    Linux Allies Rebut Microsoft Get the Facts Campaign

    By
    Peter Galli
    -
    February 13, 2006
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      The Open Source Development Labs and Linux firm Levanta are striking back at Microsofts anti-Linux “Get the Facts” research campaign.

      The Linux allies have published a 17-page research report entitled “Get the Truth on Linux Management” that challenges Redmonds claims that Linux has a higher TCO (total cost of ownership) and systems management costs than Windows.

      The studys overall conclusion is that Linux may, in many cases, be substantially less expensive to own than Windows, Andi Mann, the senior analyst at EMA (Enterprise Management Associates) of Boulder, Colo., who conducted the research and wrote the report, told eWEEK in an interview.

      “In various older studies, Microsoft and some analysts had claimed that Linux had a higher TCO than Windows and they attributed the difference mainly to higher system management costs, concluding that the higher TCO outweighed the much lower license and acquisition costs for Linux,” he said.

      However, the EMA study found that this perception was no longer accurate as, with far lower acquisition costs, Linux was now a cost-effective alternative to Windows, he said.

      The study, which was conducted last fall and winter and will be released this week, was sponsored by Levanta, Inc., a San Mateo, Calif.-based company that focuses on Linux management and data virtualization, and OSDL, of Beaverton, Oregon.

      Stuart Cohen, the CEO of OSDL, told eWEEK in an interview that the study addressed a broad set of issues in real environments, contains current and timely data, and had findings that were consistent with what its global customer councils had been telling it.

      “We thought this was worthwhile and a valuable way to bring customer confidence to people deploying Linux, which was why we agreed to sponsor it,” he said.

      Matt Mossman, the CEO of Levanta, said the company had engaged EMA to do the research and then entered into an agreement with OSDL after that for co-sponsorship.

      Last fall the company had introduced a systems management appliance and that moved it from dealing with pure data center people “who have always laughed off the TCO FUD associated with Linux because they knew it didnt work like that,” Mossman said.

      With the appliance on the market, Levanta started to run into people who had bought that line.

      “We had specific customers who questioned Linux and believed it might be difficult to manage. But when we questioned them, they said this was not their experience, but rather what they had read,” Mossman said.

      “So it became apparent to us that we should get out with the truth about whether Linux was hard to manage now and if it had ever been hard to manage. But it is important for people to know that it is not hard to manage.”

      For his part, Martin Taylor, the general manager of platform strategy at Microsoft told eWEEK that he was “excited to see the OSDL join Microsoft in working to deliver insights and facts we know customers need to help inform their IT decisions.”

      The primary EMA research surveyed a random sample of several thousand IT organizations by telephone, and over one hundred self-selected Web respondents.

      /zimages/2/28571.gifMicrosoft challenges Linuxs legacy claims. Click here to read more.

      “The study was skewed towards Linux users as we were not looking to survey primarily Windows customers, but rather Linux customers and their experiences,” Mann said.

      It was supplemented with interviews with selected CIOs and IT managers at companies ranging in size from small data centers of less than 20 servers to those with more than 1,000 servers globally and across a wide variety of large Linux and mixed environments.

      “The genesis for this research study was not a head-to-head comparison with Microsoft. The goal was simply to measure and analyze the effort required to manage Linux systems,” Mann said.

      In the study, EMA analyzed the cost factors cited in previous studies and canvassed more than 200 enterprises. It determined that organizations were managing their Linux environments more cost effectively and reliably than previously reported.

      Next Page: Comparing the results.

      Comparing the Results

      Among the key findings were that Linux tends to be more productive, as Linux administrators tend to manage more servers than Windows administrators, and Linux systems tend to handle greater workloads than Windows systems.

      Three quarters of the administrators surveyed can provision a system in less than an hour using sophisticated tools, while a third can provision a system in less than 30 minutes.

      Most Linux administrators spent less than 5 minutes per server per week on patch management. Sophisticated management tools reduce this effort even further.

      Also, in more than 60 percent of cases, when problems occur in Linux environments they are diagnosed and repaired in less than 30 minutes, more than 8 times faster than industry average.

      Some 88 percent of enterprises with Linux and Windows spent less effort managing Linux; while 97 percent said it was, at worst, the same for both systems.

      “Respondents with sophisticated management tools all report Linux management is the same or easier than Windows management,” the study found.

      Asked whether for cost comparative purposes he had looked at a vendor supported distribution and those costs rather than one that was unsupported and downloadable for free, Mann said that he did not look specifically at acquisition costs as a primary part of the research, which was rather about how difficult Linux was to manage.

      “But where I did look at cost, I essentially looked at a support agreement-type arrangement through Red Hat. Also, from the Microsoft side I was not looking at total cost, but only the purchase of a license, so that wasnt apples to apples,” he said.

      Asked about Microsofts tendency to focus on workload scenarios in the research it sponsored, Mann said those were often too specific in that respect.

      “I dont know that has a lot of merit or adds a great deal of value. I think it really brings the specific result that was in mind.”

      In conclusion, the “Get the Truth on Linux Management” study said that Linux is likely to be a significantly less expensive platform to acquire and manage than Windows.

      “Respondents indicated that the average resource costs (salaries, training and support) are no longer significantly higher than Windows and that the management of Linux is of minimal concern when considering the overall TCO,” the study said.

      Some open-source players like Julie Hanna Farris, the founder and chief strategy officer of Scalix Corp., a messaging infrastructure company based in San Mateo, Calif., whose products are based on a Linux and open systems architecture, welcomed the move.

      /zimages/2/28571.gifClick here to read how Scalix says its solution challenges Microsoft Exchange.

      OSDLs role was to enable Linux to succeed in the market and so, to the extent that there were misconceptions about Linux, they could provide a unified voice, she said.

      “I dont think this is about battling Microsoft per se as much as it is about informing the public to eliminate any confusion and misconception that may exist there.”

      Microsoft has, for the past two years, run an aggressive advertising campaign known as “Get the Facts,” where it sponsors research about issues it claims are common to Linux and Windows and important to customers.

      Last year, Microsoft proposed a joint research project with the OSDL to do some fact-based analysis of Linux and Windows, a proposal which was flatly rejected by OSDLs Cohen.

      /zimages/2/28571.gifClick here to read the interview with OSDL CEO Stuart Cohen about why he nixed Microsofts joint research offer.

      But in this latest interview, Cohen pointed that OSDL was still willing to look at joint research with Microsoft around areas like virtualization, or the desktop, or Office on Linux.

      “We would be very interested in working with them on those types of arrangements. We just want to work on something with them that is of very high value to our customers who are deploying Linux,” he said.

      Microsofts Taylor said that he continued to be open to working with partners and competitors, alike, to jointly commission research that helped all its customers engage in an informed and respectful debate on the facts.

      “While I have not yet seen this particular piece of commissioned work, there is a need for more collaborative industry research that delivers a level of transparency in the methodology so customers are able to apply it in their technology decision-making,” Taylor said.

      /zimages/2/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.

      Peter Galli
      Peter Galli has been a financial/technology reporter for 12 years at leading publications in South Africa, the UK and the US. He has been Investment Editor of South Africa's Business Day Newspaper, the sister publication of the Financial Times of London.He was also Group Financial Communications Manager for First National Bank, the second largest banking group in South Africa before moving on to become Executive News Editor of Business Report, the largest daily financial newspaper in South Africa, owned by the global Independent Newspapers group.He was responsible for a national reporting team of 20 based in four bureaus. He also edited and contributed to its weekly technology page, and launched a financial and technology radio service supplying daily news bulletins to the national broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation, which were then distributed to some 50 radio stations across the country.He was then transferred to San Francisco as Business Report's U.S. Correspondent to cover Silicon Valley, trade and finance between the US, Europe and emerging markets like South Africa. After serving that role for more than two years, he joined eWeek as a Senior Editor, covering software platforms in August 2000.He has comprehensively covered Microsoft and its Windows and .Net platforms, as well as the many legal challenges it has faced. He has also focused on Sun Microsystems and its Solaris operating environment, Java and Unix offerings. He covers developments in the open source community, particularly around the Linux kernel and the effects it will have on the enterprise.He has written extensively about new products for the Linux and Unix platforms, the development of open standards and critically looked at the potential Linux has to offer an alternative operating system and platform to Windows, .Net and Unix-based solutions like Solaris.His interviews with senior industry executives include Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Linus Torvalds, the original developer of the Linux operating system, Sun CEO Scot McNealy, and Bill Zeitler, a senior vice president at IBM.For numerous examples of his writing you can search under his name at the eWEEK Website at www.eweek.com.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      Visa’s Michael Jabbara on Cybersecurity and Digital...

      James Maguire - May 17, 2022 0
      I spoke with Michael Jabbara, VP and Global Head of Fraud Services at Visa, about the cybersecurity technology used to ensure the safe transfer...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      GoodData CEO Roman Stanek on Business Intelligence...

      James Maguire - May 4, 2022 0
      I spoke with Roman Stanek, CEO of GoodData, about business intelligence, data as a service, and the frustration that many executives have with data...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×