Red Hat Creates Fedora Foundation | eWeek

Red Hat Creates Fedora Foundation

Written By
Peter Galli
Peter Galli
Jun 3, 2005
4 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

NEW ORLEANS—Red Hat Inc. has decided to hand over control of the open-source Fedora Project, creating the new Fedora Foundation to manage the project.

Mark Webbink, the deputy general counsel at Red Hat, of Raleigh, N.C., will make the announcement during a talk at the Red Hat Summit here early Friday morning.

Until now the Fedora Project, which Red Hat describes as an “openly-developed project designed by Red Hat, open for general participation, led by a meritocracy, following a set of project objectives,” has been dominated by Red Hat staffers, with the technical lead and the steering committee all being Red Hat employees.

“The goal of The Fedora Project is to work with the Linux community to build a complete, general purpose operating system exclusively from open source software. Development will be done in a public forum … By using this more open process, we hope to provide an operating system more in line with the ideals of free software and more appealing to the open source community,” the Fedora Project Web site says.

But it appears that Fedora has not been all that appealing to developers, many of whom have questioned how Red Hat, as a commercial vendor of Linux software and support, could also control the project.

/zimages/6/28571.gifClick hereto read more about the controversy that erupted when Fedora was announced.

“We feel that we are now at a point where we need to give up absolute control. We built our company on the competence of the open-source community and its time for us to continue to manifest that,” Webbink told eWEEK in an exclusive interview before his talk.

Fedora, including the just-released Fedora Directory Server and all other components, would remain licensed under the GNU GPL (General Public License and would be placed under the control of the Foundation.

/zimages/6/28571.gifThe Free Software Foundation is working on the first revamp to the GPL in 13 years.Click hereto read more.

While Red Hat would continue to play a significant role and some of its staff are likely to help maintain some key aspects of the project, the Fedora Foundation would have its own board and drive its own agenda at that point, Webbink said.

Next page: Not everyone is convinced.


Page Two

He said that while all the details have not yet been worked out, he expects the election of the board to be an open process initially. The Foundation will pull in key people in the open-source community “who we think will approach the task with a degree of fairness and seriousness that we hope the Foundation will continue to have,” he said.

Webbink also admitted that there had been some dissatisfaction about Red Hats control of the project and said the move might make the company feel more confident that its contributions would be better used and become more widely available.

But the formation of the Fedora Foundation was not a token gesture, he stressed. While Red Hat is a publicly traded company and can not just respond to whatever the open-source community wants it to do, he said, “we are not negating our roots and this takes us back to that community. We dont take this lightly. Community is a fundamental part of our DNA and they are vitally important to us.”

Asked if there was any Fedora technology or patented technology that would not be available to the community, Webbink said there was not at this point, but “as we go forward, non-technology-related things like business method patents we register will not be available to the community.”

The Fedora Directory server also has an exception under the GPL that allows proprietary plug-ins, he said.

But not everyone is convinced. A developer at the Summit, who asked not to be named, told eWEEK he was concerned that the Fedora Foundation could end up like Suns Java Community Process, with Red Hat remaining firmly in control.

/zimages/6/28571.gifSome members of the open-source community say the Sun-led JCP actually stifles competition in some ways.Click hereto read more.

Stacey Quandt, an analyst for the Robert Frances Group who was also attending the Summit, said that community participation in Fedora was still evolving.

She also questioned whether the move was a genuine attempt by Red Hat to try to convince more developers to get involved in the Fedora community, or if it was a ruse to grow the market for Red Hat Linux.

But Red Hat CEO Matt Szulik told eWEEK that the move strengthened Red Hats commitment to Fedora. “Every single engineer in the company works on Fedora,” he said. He added that this would “absolutely continue going forward. Its the DNA of the company.”

Szulik said there were some structural reasons to hand Fedora over to the Foundation, but “we have always placed our intellectual property out to the public under the GPL license.

“This move brings a sense of orderliness and highlights the strategic importance of our relationship with the open-source community. It also brings global coherence and we want to make sure that we dispel, by better association, the notion that Fedora isnt strategic or that Red Hat is not committed to it,” he said.

/zimages/6/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.