Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News
    • Networking
    • Storage

    Microsoft Abandons Drive Extender for Vail, Aurora, Breckenridge

    By
    Fahmida Y. Rashid
    -
    November 23, 2010
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      Microsoft has decided to remove its Drive Extender storage technology from the upcoming versions of Small Business Server Essentials, Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials and Windows Home Server.

      The decision was announced Nov. 23 on the Windows Home Server blog by Michael Leworthy, a Microsoft product manager. Noting that “large hard drives of over 1TB are reasonably priced” and 2TB drives are “becoming easily accessible to small businesses,” the team felt the Drive Extender technology “was not meeting our customer needs,” wrote Leworthy.

      Microsoft’s Drive Extender technology provided the ability to take individual hard drives and pool them together into a single volume. When adding a disk to the server, administrators could select whether to add the new storage to the default storage pool to increase total capacity or designate it as a backup drive.

      Acknowledging that the decision meant there was no “integrated ability” to pool storage or for automated data duplication, Microsoft will “work closely” with OEM partners for an alternative product, according to Leworthy. “This will provide customers with greater choice as well as a seamless experience that will meet their storage needs,” he wrote.

      Critics alleged that quality hardware RAID solutions are expensive, and the resulting product is more likely to be too complicated for the less technically inclined while Drive Extender had simplified the entire process dramatically.

      Windows Server 2008 R2 has built-in capabilities for data protection, and “core features” such as automated server and PC backup, easy sharing of folders and files, remote Web access, and simplified management are still included, Leworthy wrote.

      Home Server, code-named “Vail,” Small Business Server Essentials, code-named “Aurora,” and Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials, code-named “Breckenridge,” are all in beta and are expected to be released in the first half of 2011. Leworthy said in the blog post that the anticipated product launch date remains the same, with a new beta without Drive Extender to be available early in the year.

      The Drive Extender feature, while highly anticipated, has not been without its share of controversy. In an earlier version from 2007, a serious bug caused data corruption amongst some users. Despite Leworthy’s claim that the change was fueled by customer and tester feedback, the comments on the Windows Home Server blog were negative, with customers angry that the “key feature/selling point” was being removed.

      Enthusiast site We Got Served called it a “shock move,” pointing out that the decision came almost eight months into the public beta of the three platforms. Terry Walsh called Drive Extender “one of Microsoft’s most innovative engineering feats” on the site’s blog. Walsh noted that Microsoft had been slowly re-engineering Drive Extender, limiting its potential and creating an “inherent weakness” over the past two years. His implication was that these limitations and changes were the reasons many beta testers criticized the technology, leading to Microsoft’s decision.

      Alex Kuretz, an integration and test engineer for HP’s MediaSmart Server, was a bit more blunt, writing on his blog, “It is saddening and frustrating to have invested so much time and energy into a something that has such obvious value and to then watch it slowly be dismantled into a nearly useless shell of its former being.”

      Avatar
      Fahmida Y. Rashid

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×