Server Slam: Windows Overtakes Unix, Linux Rising - Page 2
Overall mainframe revenue dropped 9.5 percent in 2005, with IBMthe mainframe market leaderseeing mainframe revenue dropping 7.6 percent. "These [x86 volume] servers continue to be the choice in increasing numbers to meet the needs of more Web users accessing more file types from more access points than ever," analyst Jeffrey Hewitt said in a statement.IBM, of Armonk, N.Y., and Hewlett-Packard, of Palo Alto, Calif., kept the top two spots for server revenue in both the fourth quarter and overall in 2005, but it was Dell, of Round Rock, Texas, that was the fastest growing of the bunch, seeing revenues rise 7.3 percent for the quarter and 13.3 percent for the year. At the same time, both Sun Microsystems and Fujitsu saw revenue growth stay relatively flat or fall. HP remained number one in server shipments, while Dell remained second. In the fourth quarter, x86 systemsfueled by the rapid adoption of 64-bit computinggarnered $6.8 billion in revenue on shipments of 1.8 million units, representing increases of 6.7 percent and 13.7 percent, respectively, according to IDC. The blade server space in the fourth quarter saw a 49.3 percent increase in shipments and 56.9 percent jump in revenue. Linux server revenue reached $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter, a jump of 20.8 percent. However, IDC analyst Jean Bozman cautioned that while Windows systems did overtake RISC servers for the first time, that didnt translate into the imminent demise of RISC servers. "Each platform offers its own advantages in terms of workloads and customer preferences, and there is substantial overlap in terms of ISV applications that run on many of these server platforms," Bozman said in a statement. "Although the trend is towards volume servers, we do not believe that any one platform will be in a position to force another platform out of the marketplace for many years to come." Indeed, IBM, HP and Sun continue to invest in these larger systems. IBM last year rolled out the latest generation of its mainframe systems, the z9, which the company $1.2 billion to develop over three years. Along with offering twice the performance and memory as the previous z990, the system also included greater virtualization and security capabilities. Officials also lauded the platforms ability to run multiple workloads, including Linux. In addition, a month after the z9 rollout, IBM launched new programs aimed at enticing students and programmers to the mainframe platform, and increased the management and monitoring capabilities. IBM also is continuing to roll out its RISC-based Power architecture, outfitting its i- and pSeries systems with the new Power5+ and talking about the upcoming Power6. However, officials also are pushing the systems as perfect platforms for Linux workloads. Read more here about how IBM partnered with Freescale on chip design. For their part, HP continues to standardize its high-end systems on Intels 64-bit Itanium chips, and Sun is offering an aggressive roadmap for its SPARC architecture. In December, the Santa Clara, Calif., company rolled out the UltraSPARC T1 chip, with up to eight cores each running up to four instructions simultaneously. With both the T1 and its Galaxy systems, powered by Advanced Micro Devices Opteron chip, Sun is aiming to break into areas dominated by x86 systems in which it doesnt traditionally play. However, those markets are seeing an increase in capabilities as well. In 2005, both AMD and Intel launched their respective dual-core processors, moves designed to increase the performance of servers running the chips without relying solely on cranking up the frequency and thus making them more attractive for use with higher-end applications. Both companies plan to expand the use of dual-core technology in their processors this year, along with such features as on-chip virtualization and security.
Backing that up was the continued growth of Dells server business, which is predicated on the scale-out architecture, and the jumps in both revenue and shipments in the blade server space.