Secret History of ITSUG
What ITSUG does is allow those who own GSM patents to share them with each other. And it was created to resolve a fierce dispute which arose when the original GSM design work was done. In those days, long ago, several large telecommunications companies rebelled against Qualcomm, owner of the CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) patents, and got together to create TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access), the basis of GSMand all the other engineering excellence which underpins the global mobile-phone network.When the patents were disclosed, there was uproar, as you can imagine; and the ETSI standards body ruled that they could keep the patentsbut must agree to license them on a fair and nondiscriminatory basis. The result is that, for some time, companies have been making phones at zero profit. They do so because the terms of the ITSUG say they cant remain part of the cartel if they arent phone makers. Technically, Ericsson isnt a phone maker; its given that part of its business to the joint venture with Sony, and Sony Ericsson makes the phones. But Ericsson uses its intellectual property in the infrastructure equipment it makesexchanges, switches, base stations and so onall using GSM technology. Is Ericsson still a member of ITSUG? Impossible to say: Membership of the cartel is confidential, and no member can disclose its membership without the agreement of the other members. Is Sendo, then, being carved up by the cartel? It so happens that it isnt. I cant tell you how I know this, although a certain lawyer can probably guess, after a conversation we had a couple of years agobut I do know that Sendo is an ITSUG member. It has a trivial number of patents compared with what companies like Siemens, Sony, Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung, Motorola and so onassuming these are memberscontribute. But it is a member. As a member, it is entitled to use Ericsson patents at a "fair and nondiscriminatory" rate. So why on earth have these two family members fallen out? Why could they not agree inside ITSUG? Ive spoken to other ITSUG membersnot that theyll admit to being members, of coursebut they all say that what Ericsson is asking is "totally out of order" and "unfair" and "wrong"and, frankly, they cant see why this is going on. In the absence of hard facts, they are indulging in speculation. Here is what they are saying, in their own internal company canteens: "Sendo is for sale." Is it? Well, its tiny, compared with giants like Nokia or Motorola. But it has broken the mould of phone manufacture. What it does is to produce nonbranded phones for the networks. That was what attracted Microsoft to it in the first placeleading to a lawsuit which was settled (secret terms!) last August. Microsoft wanted a smartphone that wasnt restricted to one manufacturer, and the Sendo design was going to be that, until they fell out. Click here to read more about the outcome of Sendos 2003 lawsuit against Microsoft. Who would want to buy Sendo? Well, Nokia, for a start. It has a (secret!) investment in Sendo, and is widely credited with rescuing Sendo when Microsoft pulled the plug on the original smart-phone design and tried to have its partner wound up. Would Nokia be the only one? Well, say the whispers over the plastic cafeteria trays, no, not the only one. No, Ericsson might like to get back into the phone business. And the price for Sendo, if it were under the cloud of a lawsuit well, it wouldnt go up, would it? Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, reviews and analysis on mobile and wireless computing.
Their achievements cant be doubtedtechnically. Where it seems they failed was on the diplomatic front, because some of those large companies sent their best engineers to the project, but secretly patented their work behind the backs of their partners.