ICANN's Top-Level Domain Plan Sure to Cause Years of Squabbling, Litigation - Cloud Computing - News & Reviews - eWeek.com

ICANN’s Top-Level Domain Plan Sure to Cause Years of Squabbling, Litigation

Written By
Wayne Rash
Wayne Rash
Jun 14, 2012
4 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

ICANN€™s Big Reveal Day revealed what everyone expected. Thousands of applicants applied for thousands of new gTLDs (generic top-level domains). The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers revealed the list of who applied for which top-level domains.

Some of the applicants and the names they applied for are no surprise. Large companies applied for TLDs that are the same as their names, for example, Google applied for .google and .youtube. Abbott Laboratories applied for .abbott.

But there are other TLDs that have many applicants. For example, the .app domain has been applied for by 13 different applicants, some of which appear suspiciously like what I suppose you would call domain trolls that intend to buy a domain and then see how much they can con someone into paying for it. The TLD .airforce, for example, wasn€™t applied for by any nation€™s air force, but by a domain-name holding company.

Some domain applications seem to have applications from seemingly equal groups. The domain .cruise applications are from two different cruise lines. Others, like .diy are being competed for by groups of holding companies. But still others, such as .foodnetwork, are being applied for only by a single domain brokerage. You can guess who they€™ll try to sell that one to.

What€™s happened here is that a number of companies failed to protect their trademarks, and now they€™re finding that someone else has applied for the TLD, and if they want it, they€™ll have to put up with either a trademark lawsuit or fork over a ton of cash to get it.

Most of the really big companies out there apparently have marketing officers savvy enough to know that applying for a TLD in their name was a good way to protect their trademark, and to ensure that their customers wouldn€™t be confused by an email or a Website that seems to be theirs, but isn€™t.

So what€™s going to happen when this all shakes out? For many applicants, the process will be straightforward. They€™re either the trademark holder and they were the only applicant for a domain, so they will get it; or they represent a region, such as the applicant for .barcelona, which represents the region. They€™ll also get their choice.

Then there are the vast numbers of domain trolls that have applied for names such as .shop, and no matter what ICANN does, there€™ll probably be a fight.


Some Marketing Execs Have Explaining to Do

While ICANN has a time stamp process that€™s supposed to give priority, it€™s unclear exactly how that€™s going to work out.

But for those fairly generic domain applicants for things like .home, it would seem that the only solution that will ultimately decide who gets what will be a trip to the courts, and that will be an interesting challenge indeed. For one thing, it€™ll be hard to prove which of the various domain trolls has a better claim than another. Adding to the complexity is that these companies are from all over the world, so it€™s not like a trip to the federal courts will solve the problem.

One company, Top Level Domain Holdings, is based in London, and its stated purpose is to invest in domain names so it can sell them at a profit. On the other hand, some well-known ISPs and Internet companies, such as Godaddy.com, have applied for a variety of TLDs, which one can assume will be used to offer hosting to customers.

It would be unfair of me to cast all of these companies as domain trolls, because in many cases they are simply companies who plan to control these fairly generic names and sell them for what the market will bear. It€™s a simple business transaction.

But then there are the companies that are applying for another company€™s trademark as a domain name, such as .homedepot, where it€™s obvious that the plan is to hold the Home Depot TLD hostage.

There is a process in which trademark holders can challenge an assignment of their trademark as a domain name to someone who doesn€™t have rights to the trademark. But, again, it€™s not clear how long this could take or how much it is likely to cost.

But it could be worse. Most of the major companies with significant value in their trademarks applied for their own TLDs, and they don€™t have anyone else trying to do the same. In a situation like that, there will be no contest.

But for a few, the contest may go on for what seems like forever. You have to wonder how the Travel Channel let the TLD .travelchannel go to a likely domain troll, just as Food Network did. Clearly, a marketing officer somewhere is going to have a lot of explaining to do. But in the long run, it€™s going to be the lawyers who spend the rest of their careers making the biggest profit of all.

To follow Wayne Rash on Google Plus, click here.

To follow Wayne Rash on Twitter, click here.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.