Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Database
    • Database

    Oracles Multicore Dilemma

    By
    Charles Garry
    -
    December 21, 2005
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      In a move to “simplify” pricing and create hardware “parity,” Oracle has announced once again that they have changed their database pricing for the second time in less than six months.

      After listening to Jacqueline Woods, Oracles vice president of pricing and licensing on a conference call explaining the latest policy shift, it seems clear that Oracle has achieved neither simplicity nor parity.

      For example, Ms. Woods explained that the new policy assigns pricing factors of either .25 (Sun T1), .5 (AMD and Intel), or .75 for all other multicore processors.

      This means that to calculate how much a processor license costs if you were buying a server with the new Sun UtraSparc T1 with 8 cores you would calculate as follows 8*.25*40,000=$80,000 per socket to license Oracles Enterprise Edition database.

      If you were to purchase Oracle on a AMD dual-core chip, you would calculate the license costs as 2*.5*40,000=$40,000 per socket.

      /zimages/7/28571.gifClick here to read about Oracle combining its identity management offerings.

      Do you get it? You better start pulling out the spreadsheets now to start calculating that new purchase, especially if your shop runs different types of servers.

      How exactly does this change make things easier for customers? I get that Oracle is in a bad place right now. I mean, they have essentially lowered their prices for the second time in six months and yet I doubt many will be all that excited about the change.

      Its just too difficult to accurately maintain such a convoluted approach. Dont forget, many customers still have older versions of Oracle licensing models gone bad that they still must maintain or convert to the new model at a rate that is always much too favorable for Oracle.

      Perhaps its just time that Oracle admitted it has no clue how it should license their software in the face of a changing technology landscape.

      Customers hate change, especially when it comes to licensing, which has traditionally been the number one sore point that users have had with Oracle.

      This will not stop here, that you can count on. What happens when we get 10 cores or 20? Oracle cannot continue to change their policy every six months. If they do, the market will abandon them.

      People hate too much change, so Oracle better figure out a viable long-term plan pretty quickly. Multicore chips are mostly about power savings and cooler operating temperatures than they are about performance.

      Ms. Woods claimed that dual-core delivers between 1.5 and 1.75 the performance of a single core processor. Then what does an eight core processor deliver? These performance numbers are also highly dependent on the workloads the server is expected to execute, so the whole argument is spurious at best.

      /zimages/7/28571.gifOracle smartens up on multicore. Click here to read more.

      I believe that what the market wants first and foremost is a simplified pricing scheme. Oracles new plan is a poor example of that.

      As I stated six months ago when Oracle announced its last pricing change, the licensing model must be changed completely. Sell a single edition of the software with a per server based price. Then sell support packages which can be based on the level of service selected and perhaps the company size.

      Of course, there are always options that can be sold as well, also on a flat per server model. Would such a model impact Oracles revenue? Certainly at first, but over the longer term the stability and simplicity could make up for the lost revenue with greater sales volumes and more profitable support offerings.

      One thing is for certain, complexity will only erode market share over time.

      Charles Garry is an independent industry analyst based in Simsbury, Conn. He is a former vice president with META Groups Technology Research Services. He can be reached at cegarry@yahoo.com.

      /zimages/7/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest database news, reviews and analysis.

      Charles Garry

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Big Data and Analytics

      Alteryx’s Suresh Vittal on the Democratization of...

      James Maguire - May 31, 2022 0
      I spoke with Suresh Vittal, Chief Product Officer at Alteryx, about the industry mega-shift toward making data analytics tools accessible to a company’s complete...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      Visa’s Michael Jabbara on Cybersecurity and Digital...

      James Maguire - May 17, 2022 0
      I spoke with Michael Jabbara, VP and Global Head of Fraud Services at Visa, about the cybersecurity technology used to ensure the safe transfer...
      Read more
      Applications

      Cisco’s Thimaya Subaiya on Customer Experience in...

      James Maguire - May 10, 2022 0
      I spoke with Thimaya Subaiya, SVP and GM of Global Customer Experience at Cisco, about the factors that create good customer experience – and...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      GoodData CEO Roman Stanek on Business Intelligence...

      James Maguire - May 4, 2022 0
      I spoke with Roman Stanek, CEO of GoodData, about business intelligence, data as a service, and the frustration that many executives have with data...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Yotascale CEO Asim Razzaq on Controlling Multicloud...

      James Maguire - May 5, 2022 0
      Asim Razzaq, CEO of Yotascale, provides guidance on understanding—and containing—the complex cost structure of multicloud computing. Among the topics we covered:  As you survey the...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2022 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×