Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Applications
    • Applications
    • Development

    Service First Keeps Developers in the Lead

    By
    Peter Coffee
    -
    June 27, 2005
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      There are two ways to mount a successful software initiative. The first is to identify a costly problem and solve it with an easily deployed tool that users will quickly recognize and value.

      The second is to identify and solve the problems that are shared by people who are trying to succeed the first way. In the process, theres one key mistake to avoid: Never let any one vendors IT platform define your approach.

      Those points were at the foundation of my keynote remarks this month at an annual session on entrepreneurial opportunities in software, conducted by the Caltech/MIT Enterprise Forum and sponsored by the Software Council of Southern California.

      We met at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, where its likely that well revisit the topic in mid-June of next year (if you want to mark your calendar now).

      Within the enterprise, I observed during the session, the “find a problem” strategy is the one thats most likely to find a business unit as its champion and patron; the independent developer, though, can also pursue this route, with many finding enterprise partners who become both early adopters and almost co-creators.

      Those enterprise alpha users dont seem to mind giving their competitors a chance to use, eventually, the same technology. I suspect that there are two reasons for this. First, the early adopters get a head start on optimizing business processes around the new tool, and having a competitor in a reactive, catch-up mode is better than having a competitor that leapfrogs you with its own independent initiatives.

      The second reason is a form of Metcalfes Law: In many cases, a technology becomes more valuable as more people use it. A supply chain integration tool, for example, will find more partners adopting compatible interfaces when there are more user organizations.

      /zimages/5/28571.gifAn array of enterprise-applications choices overwhelm SMBs. Click here to read more.

      Another successful approach to software is the same one that works in a gold rush. Regardless of whether theres actually gold out there, you can always sell eggs, shovels and blue jeans to the people who think there is.

      When everyone from the bookseller to the pharmaceutical researcher is deploying Web services, both the producers and the consumers of those services will be seeking service management tools. When everyone wants to do business securely on the Web, everyone needs security technologies.

      The shovel-selling approach might seem vulnerable to commoditization or to winner-take-all dynamics in which the first perceived leader becomes the preferred provider and everyone else is marginalized.

      To guard against either of those failure modes, one has to be a service provider first and a software provider second.

      If you not only package expertise in the form of software but also tailor the product to the customers site and support the customer in adopting and using the product, youre no more a commodity than a lawyer or a doctor or an accountant. Any such professional can theoretically be replaced by another who applies the same shared body of expertise, but each represents a “sticky” investment in building familiarity and trust.

      I warned against letting any IT platform provider draw your road map. Depending on Apple to build PowerPC machines or on Microsoft to deliver an all-.Net operating system are recent examples of how to make such a mistake.

      /zimages/5/28571.gifRead more here about developer reaction to Apples decision to switch from IBMs PowerPC processors to Intels Pentium chips.

      Building applications in Java or using so-called AJAX (asynchronous JavaScript and XML) to deliver functions efficiently via the Web are strategies less vulnerable to other peoples changes of direction.

      Within these general guidelines, there are specific trends. Applications that address the needs of an aging population or that integrate online and personal-presence technologies are clearly targets of opportunity.

      But the best way to fail as a software entrepreneur is to read market research and target your efforts at an area thats supposed to be hot, even if you have no particular expertise in that area. Plenty of other uninspired teams will be aiming at the same target for the same bad reason.

      Thats a route to “me-too” software that wont be any fun to write. Who needs that?

      Peter Coffee can be reached at [email protected]

      /zimages/5/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, reviews and analysis about productivity and business solutions.

      Avatar
      Peter Coffee
      Peter Coffee is Director of Platform Research at salesforce.com, where he serves as a liaison with the developer community to define the opportunity and clarify developers' technical requirements on the company's evolving Apex Platform. Peter previously spent 18 years with eWEEK (formerly PC Week), the national news magazine of enterprise technology practice, where he reviewed software development tools and methods and wrote regular columns on emerging technologies and professional community issues.Before he began writing full-time in 1989, Peter spent eleven years in technical and management positions at Exxon and The Aerospace Corporation, including management of the latter company's first desktop computing planning team and applied research in applications of artificial intelligence techniques. He holds an engineering degree from MIT and an MBA from Pepperdine University, he has held teaching appointments in computer science, business analytics and information systems management at Pepperdine, UCLA, and Chapman College.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×