HP Settles Autonomy-Related Shareholder Suit for $100M | eWeek

HP Settles Autonomy-Related Shareholder Suit for $100M

tech business
Written By
Jeff Burt
Jeff Burt
Jun 9, 2015
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Hewlett-Packard’s misguided acquisition of British software maker Autonomy keeps getting more expensive.

After spending about $11 billion to buy the company in 2011 and a year later having to shell out another $8.8 billion in charges related to what HP officials have said were questionable accounting practices by Autonomy’s former executives, the giant tech vendor will pay out another $100 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by disgruntled shareholders.

HP officials announced the settlement June 9, saying that while they believed the lawsuit has no merit, the agreement with PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V.—a Dutch pension fund manager that served as the lead plaintiff in the suit—was preferable over continued and protracted litigation. In line with the agreement, HP will pay the $100 million to a settlement fund that has been set up to compensate people who bought HP shares between Aug. 19, 2011, and Nov. 20, 2012.

PGGM and other shareholders have claimed that HP executives failed to do the due diligence before buying Autonomy and then made misleading statements about the software maker’s value and the problems with it following the acquisition. A subsequent stock-price drop after the $8.8 billion write-down and claims by HP executives of Autonomy officials’ over-valuation of its company further fueled the shareholder lawsuit against HP.

HP CEO Meg Whitman—who was on the vendor’s board of directors at the time of the Autonomy acquisition—has said in the past that while there were questions about the acquisition, the software was still valuable to the company. However, much of the headlines regarding HP and Autonomy over the past two-plus years have been about court cases and investigation, and HP has been aggressive in moving against the former Autonomy executives in an effort to recoup some of the lost money.

HP earlier this year filed suit in London against former Autonomy CEO Mike Lynch and ex-Chief Financial Officer Sushovan Hussain, blaming the two for allegedly fraudulent actions during their time with the software vendor. HP is seeking about $5 billion from the two.

At the time, Autonomy’s former management team said it would respond by suing HP for $148 million, claiming the comments HP executives have made about them have been false and negligent and have cost them money, adding that HP efforts amounted to a “smear campaign.” Lynch has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, saying problems with Autonomy after the sale were the result of poor management by HP officials.

HP bought Autonomy during the 11-month tenure of CEO Leo Apotheker, who wanted to build up the company’s enterprise software capabilities. Autonomy’s software enabled businesses to search and retrieve information in databases and other repositories across computer networks.

The settlement comes as HP executives prepare to split the company in two Nov. 1. One company, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, will sell enterprise products and services, including servers, storage, networking and cloud solutions. Whitman will be that company’s CEO.

The other company, HP Inc., will focus on PCs and printers.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.