Close
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Video
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Subscribe
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Video
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Subscribe
    Home Applications
    • Applications
    • PC Hardware

    Why Intel Finally Fired Back at Apple’s PC Attack

    eWEEK PERSPECTIVE: This week, Intel finally responded, coming to the PC's defense and using the same actor that Apple used, focusing this new audience on what makes a PC stand out against the Mac.

    Written by

    Rob Enderle
    Published March 18, 2021
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

      One of the most iconic advertising campaigns in the 2000s was the Apple Mac vs. PC campaign.  It was a campaign that stood largely unopposed and made fun of Bill Gates and the PC platform, doing substantial damage to the dominant personal productivity platform’s perceptions.

      At the time, I wondered why Steve Ballmer, who ran Microsoft at the time, allowed Apple to attack Gates, who was both his friend and the guy who put him into the Microsoft CEO job. I concluded that perhaps Steve resented that Bill got so much credit for creating the platform and liked that this campaign brought Gates down a peg, but it was my first clue that Steve likely wouldn’t last as CEO given he effectively still reported to Bill.

      While I was impressed with that campaign because it focused on making Gates look stupid as it promoted Apple’s offering, it also thought it was mean-spirited. It didn’t move the bar very much, because it appeared more like a personal attack than a truly viable effort to drive Mac sales.

      This week, Intel finally responded, coming to the PC’s defense and using the same actor that Apple used, focusing this new audience on what makes a PC stand out against the Mac. I can see some logical places where this campaign could go next and even have a more significant impact.

      Let’s talk about Intel’s belated shot at Apple this week.

      Looking at Apple differently

      Apple has the unenviable reputation of being a horrid company with which to partner. I don’t know a single company that has partnered with them that doesn’t eventually regret having them as a partner. Bill Gates had personally stepped in with a $150 million investment that helped Steve Jobs turn the company around back in 1997, making the Mac vs. PC campaign disparaging Gates seem a tad ungrateful.

      Qualcomm was instrumental in creating the iPhone, yet Apple aggressively moved to put Qualcomm out of business to make a few more margin points. Andy Grove, who initially was a huge Steve Jobs fan, was outspoken about his hatred of the guy before he died in 2011, and Apple was instrumental in knocking Intel out of the smartphone market. Musicmatch’s support of the iPod massively increased iPod sales and was a critical component of the iPod’s eventual dominance, yet Apple also put them out of business.

      Apple’s massive margins suggest that it is mining their customers for money and taking advantage of the massive loyalty those customers hold for their firm. This last point suggests Apple is misleading customers and that Apple products are highly overpriced for what they provide. Intel, which operates in a more competitive market, rather than attacking Jobs or Tim Cook, instead attacks the image that Apple Macs are a good value.

      Intel’s Apple shot

      Intel series of videos focuses on what Windows PC have that Apple Macs don’t. Using Apple’s ex-spokesperson adds credibility to the messages, which are well-founded and don’t appear to overreach. Intel needs to stay credible, and it does, pointing out that Macs provide far less choice, far less variety, far less flexibility, and far less innovation than Macs do.

      Intel’s apparent exposure isn’t, yet, showcasing is that PCs provide more excellent value for the money. The lack of competition in Apple’s ecosystem assures Apple’s huge margins, but it also means an Apple user pays more and gets less than someone using a PC. Intel calls out touch screens, 2-in-1 flexibility, product diversity, PC gaming (Mac users don’t play games), and multiple monitors (Apple supports one external monitor).

      In each case, the direct message is that you get more with the PC, but Intel’s more significant case is building; one I expect they’ll flesh out later is that you are paying more and getting less. This video series could eventually become very powerful if people viewing the videos conclude that Apple is taking advantage of them. Nobody likes being taken advantage of; this would be a repeat of what happened to IBM in the late 1980s, when Sun Microsystems worked to convince the market that IBM was taking advantage of its customers. Seemingly overnight IBM went from one of the most influential brands and companies to a brand with negative equity, and suddenly an ex-CEO was being put on deathwatch.

      Apple’s problem

      During Steve Jobs’ tenure as CEO, Apple’s marketing budget was unaffordable by any other company.  But Tim Cook, to maximize Apple’s valuation, has been quietly cutting back on expenses like marketing, allowing the firm to coast on Steve Jobs’s past accomplishments. Apple can certainly afford, financially, to counter Intel’s attack but, if they do so now, it will increase their expenses significantly, causing the firm’s valuation to fall. Cook’s focus on margin and valuation and his lack of understanding for marketing work against him here. He is likely not to respond to defend the Apple brand for fear of collapsing Apple’s valuation.

      In effect, Cook is caught between a rock and a hard place where he is screwed if he responds and screwed if he does not. I have no doubt Jobs would have responded with a vengeance to Intel’s attack, but Cook isn’t Jobs, and this fight will likely showcase the difference between the two CEOs more definitively than anything else.

      One additional problem: Companies are afraid to go after Apple for fear of reprisals. This fear was one of the things that caused Microsoft Zune to fail; Microsoft’s executive team was afraid of what Apple would do if they indeed went after the iPod. This perception of invulnerability is a considerable Apple asset. Still, suppose Intel is successful with this effort. In that case, that image of Apple being untouchable will be tarnished. It should open the company to other competitive attacks that competing firms are suddenly less afraid of Apple.

      Wrapping up:  The new Intel and the new Apple

      Companies change over time, and with Pat Gelsinger, who took over Feb. 15 and was long thought to be the best CEO that Intel could hope to get, this initial battle should showcase just how different the new Intel is from the old. But it could also showcase more definitively than any other recent event how much Apple is unlike the Apple of Steve Jobs and how constrained it is by huge margins and valuation.

      Apple has been coasting for some time now on Jobs’s marketing work, and Intel has just started to exploit that.  If successful, this should open Apple up to even more attacks, and with its vast margins and profits, Apple is vulnerable.

      For me, it was just fun to see another example of how a little creative marketing can have a huge potential impact.  A lesson Apple once taught to and now appears to be about to learn from Intel.  What comes around goes around right?

      Rob Enderle
      Rob Enderle
      https://enderlegroup.com
      Rob Enderle is a principal at Enderle Group. He is a nationally recognized analyst and a longtime writer for eWEEK and Pund-IT. Enderle is considered one of the top 10 IT analysts in the world by Apollo Research, which evaluated 3,960 technology analysts and their individual press coverage metrics.
      Twitter

      Get the Free Newsletter!

      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

      Get the Free Newsletter!

      Subscribe to Daily Tech Insider for top news, trends & analysis

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Artificial Intelligence

      9 Best AI 3D Generators You Need...

      Sam Rinko - June 25, 2024 0
      AI 3D Generators are powerful tools for many different industries. Discover the best AI 3D Generators, and learn which is best for your specific use case.
      Read more
      Cloud

      RingCentral Expands Its Collaboration Platform

      Zeus Kerravala - November 22, 2023 0
      RingCentral adds AI-enabled contact center and hybrid event products to its suite of collaboration services.
      Read more
      Artificial Intelligence

      8 Best AI Data Analytics Software &...

      Aminu Abdullahi - January 18, 2024 0
      Learn the top AI data analytics software to use. Compare AI data analytics solutions & features to make the best choice for your business.
      Read more
      Latest News

      Zeus Kerravala on Networking: Multicloud, 5G, and...

      James Maguire - December 16, 2022 0
      I spoke with Zeus Kerravala, industry analyst at ZK Research, about the rapid changes in enterprise networking, as tech advances and digital transformation prompt...
      Read more
      Video

      Datadog President Amit Agarwal on Trends in...

      James Maguire - November 11, 2022 0
      I spoke with Amit Agarwal, President of Datadog, about infrastructure observability, from current trends to key challenges to the future of this rapidly growing...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2024 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.