Close
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Latest News
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Networking
  • Cybersecurity
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Storage
  • Sponsored
  • Mobile
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Latest News
    • Servers

    IBM Takes New Tack in SCO Legal Battle

    By
    Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
    -
    August 17, 2004
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      IBM is trying to knock out SCOs Linux intellectual property claims with a new tactic.

      In its latest motion, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for Utah, IBM argues not only that The SCO Group Inc. has been unable to prove that IBM ever “dumped” Unix System V code into Linux, but also that there is “less than one percent of the total lines of (System V) code in AIX and Dynix,” and that if IBM placed any of the rest of the 99 percent of their own “homegrown” code into Linux, IBM had a perfect right to do so.

      AIX and Dynix are proprietary versions of Unix that belong to IBM.

      Kelly Talcott, an IP (intellectual property) attorney and partner at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLPs New York office explained: “The focus of IBMs motion is not on the Unix System V code that SCO claims IBM copied. It is instead on source code that IBM claims was developed independently, is not subject to copyright infringement claims, and so (says IBM) can freely be contributed to Linux.” IBM does not say, however, that it actually had contributed any code to Linux.

      “Essentially, IBM seeks to remove its homegrown code from the cloud of suspicion caused by the SCO lawsuit,” Talcott continued. “For purposes of this motion, the 70,000 or so lines of code that SCO claims IBM copied from Unix are essentially irrelevant. IBM is seeking a determination that it is free to contribute other code, not directly in dispute as being infringing, as open-source software.” Thus, IBM is saying that, if it had wanted to, it could have contributed AIX and Dynix code to Linux.

      This also means that IBM is now adding to its legal fight with SCO the argument that IBM doesnt need to show SCO any more of its AIX and Dynix source code. And, as part and parcel of that, IBM argues that SCO has no right to tell IBM what it can do with its own homegrown Unix operating system code.

      Pamela Jones, editor of Groklaw, a SCO news and opinion site, thinks this could be the beginning of the end for SCOs case, declaring, “If IBM wins this motion, I think I might be in my red dress soon.”

      IBM also pointed out in the motion that as of August 3, SCO was still offering the Linux 2.4 kernel for download. Therefore, since SCO was still knowingly offering the code, containing what they claimed was their IP under the GPL; SCO had knowingly given their source code to the world under the GPL. This, IBM lawyers argue, renders SCOs case moot.

      However, SCO, despite recent legal setbacks in its cases with AutoZone and DaimlerChrysler, shows no signs of backing down from its broad-ranging legal claims.

      In an eWEEK interview, SCO CEO Darl McBride said, “We have put those claims in front of the courts; well get in front of them and win, and well be back in the game.”

      Regarding this latest IBM move, SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell said, “SCO disagrees with IBMs interpretation of their contractual obligations regarding derivative works. The SCO Group is the sole owner of the AT&T Unix System V software licensing agreements, including the software agreement that IBM entered into when they licensed Unix System V in order to create their derivative work known as AIX.”

      Stowell continued: “We allege that IBM, through its contributions of AIX into Linux, is in breach of this software agreement. According to IBMs interpretation from their most recent filing, the 1985 UNIX software agreement would provide less intellectual property protection than if no contract had been written at all. We look forward to proving our case in a court of law in the near future.”

      Talcott said he is looking forward to this. “By filing a summary judgment motion on the four breach-of-contract claims, IBM is telling SCO to put up or shut up,” she said. “To defeat IBMs motion, SCO must convince the court that the material facts that support IBM are actually in legitimate dispute. Even if IBM loses this motion, it may gain important insight into how SCO plans to prove its case at trial.”

      Check out eWEEK.coms Linux & Open Source Center at http://linux.eweek.com for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.

      Be sure to add our eWEEK.com Linux news feed to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo page

      Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
      I'm editor-at-large for Ziff Davis Enterprise. That's a fancy title that means I write about whatever topic strikes my fancy or needs written about across the Ziff Davis Enterprise family of publications. You'll find most of my stories in Linux-Watch, DesktopLinux and eWEEK. Prior to becoming a technology journalist, I worked at NASA and the Department of Defense on numerous major technological projects.

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      Logo

      eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site’s focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Advertisers

      Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on eWeek and our other IT-focused platforms.

      Advertise with Us

      Menu

      • About eWeek
      • Subscribe to our Newsletter
      • Latest News

      Our Brands

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms
      • About
      • Contact
      • Advertise
      • Sitemap
      • California – Do Not Sell My Information

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×