Vendor Lock-In Cited as Cost of Windows over Linux

Vendor Lock-In Cited as Cost of Windows over Linux

Written By
Peter Galli
Peter Galli
Jul 28, 2004
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

PORTLAND, Ore.—The business case for adopting Linux over Microsofts Windows is an economic decision, but not one where the total cost of ownership is a fundamental issue, an executive from a business technology advisory group told a session at the OReilly Open Source Convention (Oscon) here Tuesday afternoon.

In his talk, titled “Linux Versus Windows: Business Perspectives,” Peter Shay, executive vice president of the Advisory Council, said one fundamental business issue at hand is that the essence of “open” is the avoidance of vendor lock-in. In the long term, he said, the users of proprietary systems are at their vendors mercy.

“The economic value of open lies in the ability for users to walk away from onerous vendor pricing or licensing, the negotiating leverage they have, and the ability to avoid vendor-unique extensions,” Shay said.

/zimages/1/28571.gifClick hereto read about Microsofts ad campaign against Linux.

Several research reports posted on Microsofts “Get the Facts” Web site showed the TCO (total cost of ownership) of Linux as higher than that for Windows, but the reports were based on widely differing assumptions, Shay said.

Some industries such as financial services and health care—which are highly regulated and have all sorts of requirements about how they handle data and what they do with it—also have to evaluate their liability risk, he said.

Shay noted an intellectual property risk to Linux users, as seen in SCOs lawsuit against IBM and others, as well as potential stealth patent risks. But he said the indemnification offered by some vendors helps offset the risk.

/zimages/1/28571.gifClick herefor an interview with SCO CEO Darl McBride on why he thinks the company can win its legal battles over Unix.

“There are a lot of different factors that go into TCO, and the published reports make widely differing assumptions that may or may not pertain to your business. Do your own analysis,” Shay said.

“The essence of open is the avoidance of vendor lock-in. Do your own cost-of-ownership analysis and ignore the SCO legal actions as entertainment, nothing more,” he urged. “But the available, current technical skills should be a major factor in your decision.”

/zimages/1/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms Linux & Open Source Center at http://linux.eweek.com for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.

/zimages/1/77042.gif

Be sure to add our eWEEK.com Linux news feed to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo page

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.