Hewlett-Packard and CEO Meg Whitman will have to defend themselves in a class-action suit filed by investors who believe they were misled about the details around the company’s troubled $11.3 billion acquisition of software vendor Autonomy in 2011.
A U.S. District Court judge in San Francisco ruled Nov. 26 that there were enough legitimate issues raised in the lawsuit to let it proceed. However, Judge Charles Breyer did dismiss claims against former CEO Leo Apotheker, ex-Autonomy CEO Mike Lynch and several other Autonomy officials, arguing that there was not enough evidence presented in the lawsuit to support claims that they, too, misled investors.
The investors in the $1 billion lawsuit claim that Whitman and other HP executives did not fully divulge the problems with the Autonomy acquisition, even when they knew HP would have to take an $8.8 billion charge in November 2012 over the troubled deal. For example, in comments she made in May and June 2012, Whitman never mentioned that at the time she was concerned about possible accounting problems at Autonomy.
During a September 2012 conference call to discuss quarterly financial numbers, Whitman—who was on the company’s board of directors when the Autonomy deal was first broached and was CEO when it closed—said the software vendor’s value “approximated the carrying value,” even though she and others knew it was very possible that HP had overpaid for Autonomy, the judge ruled.
However, Breyer also said the investors had not yet established “any coherent motive as to why defendants would knowingly purchase a company for several times its actual value or that they knew Autonomy’s accounting was problematic.”
The Autonomy deal was among several large acquisitions that HP has made over the past several years—some analysts have said dating back to its 2002 purchase of PC maker Compaq—that had questionable returns or cost the company even more money. The $8.8 billion charge relating to the Autonomy acquisition came only months after HP announced it was taking an $8 billion write-down related to its $13.9 billion acquisition in 2008 of services vendor EDS Systems.
After announcing the Autonomy charge, HP officials laid the blame with executives with the software company, accusing them of playing with the financial numbers to make Autonomy look stronger than it was during the lead-up to the closing of the deal. Ex-Autonomy CEO Lynch has denied the claim, saying any problems with the acquisition stem from HP’s mishandling of the company after the sale.
In the lawsuit filed by PGGM Vermogensbeheer and others, shareholders said HP officials failed to do their due diligence in investigating Autonomy before the deal, and that afterward, HP—in its desire to build up its big data capabilities—vastly overpaid for the company.
In addition, the plaintiffs said HP tried to back out of the deal at the last minute, but were told by advisors that it couldn’t under U.K. law.
Despite the issues surrounding the deal, Whitman said in April during a news conference in London that Autonomy was still a key part of the company’s future.
“We remain committed to Autonomy; we remain committed to the brand, to Cambridge, to the U.K. [where Autonomy is based],” she said, according to the news organization. “It is an almost magical technology. … It plays into a big shift in the market, the area of big data, which HP should be in.”
